Chew Magna has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The third paragraph of the History section read as follows:
The the mid an early 15th century section is unclear. I have attempted to improve this, however, I am not certain that what the sentence has ended up saying is correct. Feel free to improve this. — Grstain 17:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
I have recently reviewed this article & found that it meets the criterion for being a good article. So I have promoted it to GA status. My congratulations to all the contributors for doing a fine job.
Cheers
Srik e it( talk ¦ ✉) 14:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed.
I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GA/R). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAC. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Regards, Epbr123 21:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
The article states, "The village is a part of the Wansdyke constituency, which will become North East Somerset". This reads as though it will merely be a name change, but from other sources it appears the boundaries will also change. The text in the article should be adjusted to make this clearer. [4] will suffice as a citation for the constituency change. Epbr123 08:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Epbr123 09:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
The introduction reads:
“There are two primary schools and a secondary school,…”
The section titled ‘Schools’ lists only one primary school and, with regard to the secondary school, correctly states:
“Chew Valley School is the main secondary school (11–18 years) for the valley.[18] It is situated between Chew Magna and Chew Stoke.”
I believe that here is only one primary school in the parish, and the secondary school is adjacent to, but outwith, the parish.
Therefore I suggest that the introduction section be amended to read:
“There is one primary school, and an adjacent secondary school,…” Troggers ( talk) 07:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
A recent edit has added information about a Baker family memorial in the Church of St Andrew and the manor of "Chew Baker", as I'm not familiar with it and can't find any sources which mention it. Has anyone anymore info or sources?— Rod talk 19:44, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
I've been to the church in Chew Magna. The family there isn't Baker it's BABER. That's me, Harriet Baber! This should be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.19.39.211 ( talk) 18:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chew Magna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.wishful-thinking.org.uk/genuki/SOM/ChewMagna/StAndrew.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chew Magna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chew Magna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Chew Magna has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The third paragraph of the History section read as follows:
The the mid an early 15th century section is unclear. I have attempted to improve this, however, I am not certain that what the sentence has ended up saying is correct. Feel free to improve this. — Grstain 17:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
I have recently reviewed this article & found that it meets the criterion for being a good article. So I have promoted it to GA status. My congratulations to all the contributors for doing a fine job.
Cheers
Srik e it( talk ¦ ✉) 14:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed.
I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GA/R). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAC. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Regards, Epbr123 21:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
The article states, "The village is a part of the Wansdyke constituency, which will become North East Somerset". This reads as though it will merely be a name change, but from other sources it appears the boundaries will also change. The text in the article should be adjusted to make this clearer. [4] will suffice as a citation for the constituency change. Epbr123 08:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Epbr123 09:45, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
The introduction reads:
“There are two primary schools and a secondary school,…”
The section titled ‘Schools’ lists only one primary school and, with regard to the secondary school, correctly states:
“Chew Valley School is the main secondary school (11–18 years) for the valley.[18] It is situated between Chew Magna and Chew Stoke.”
I believe that here is only one primary school in the parish, and the secondary school is adjacent to, but outwith, the parish.
Therefore I suggest that the introduction section be amended to read:
“There is one primary school, and an adjacent secondary school,…” Troggers ( talk) 07:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
A recent edit has added information about a Baker family memorial in the Church of St Andrew and the manor of "Chew Baker", as I'm not familiar with it and can't find any sources which mention it. Has anyone anymore info or sources?— Rod talk 19:44, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
I've been to the church in Chew Magna. The family there isn't Baker it's BABER. That's me, Harriet Baber! This should be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.19.39.211 ( talk) 18:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chew Magna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.wishful-thinking.org.uk/genuki/SOM/ChewMagna/StAndrew.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chew Magna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chew Magna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)