![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This needs the gas mileage.
This sentence should be changed since the Avalanche is not technically a pickup.
No, it is not.
Sneakernets
09:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Yup, the avalanche is actually an SUV that looks like a truck. True pickups have a seperate cab and bed on the chassis. The Avalanche has a unified cab/bed design.
No, just as the Suburban is a truck-based station wagon, the Avalanche is a Suburban-based truck...so technically a truck-based truck, but that's what they wanted to build. A pickup truck has a bed, and it can be unibody...like the 1961-63 Ford F100.
74.104.189.176 (
talk)
02:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
The entire section is in the wrong spot, isn't it? It should be with the GMT800 section, not the GMT900 section, because it says the later models didn't have the problem. It also sounds like it was quoted from a GM excecutive when the problem first arose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.157.23.39 ( talk) 23:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Maybe the article should mention that the plastic cladding doesn't respond well to wax products. Car wax looks nasty when it gets on the plastic cladding. The best product I've used to circumvent this is Turtle Wax's Black Chrome. But after Turtle Wax stopped making Black Chrome, I've found that Mother's Back To Black is almost as good.
The [Edit]
'button's for the first three sections (firstgeneration, secondgeneration, and thirdgeneration) all are showing up in the wrong location under cladding problems. Anyway to fix this? --
$user log (
talk)
13:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I removed both forum links under WP:EL. Do not re-add the links, as you are aware of WP:EL and WP:3RR, which will apply if you add them.
Instead, talk it out. Come to this discussion to meet Wikipedia's standards. If you can't reach consensus, consider WP:DR. If not, a block for WP:3RR will be coming your way. tedder ( talk) 07:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
I understand your points of view Sable232 and apologize for violating the site policies. Based on what I read above I am allowed to add our link to the page and will do just that.
Thanks for your time,
Todd GrowUpAlready ( talk) 00:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Sorry Tedder, I thought this was resolved since there were no replies to Sable232’s post on 10/16. I added the link back to the article (four days later) based on Sable232’s statement: “Actually, since both those sites offer technical information beyond the scope of the article they ARE allowed.” I added the link to the Chevy Avalanche Fan Club of North America's offical site based on What to link
Todd amd1900mp 02:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrowUpAlready ( talk • contribs)
Tedder, Based on the "What to link" opening statement which reads;
There are several things that should be considered when adding an external link.
·Is the site content accessible to the reader? (Yes, no registration required)
·Is the site content proper in the context of the article (useful, tasteful, informative, factual, etc.)? (Yes)
·Is the link functional and likely to remain functional? (Yes, since 2001)
What Should Be Linked #1, 2 & 3.
And also as you mentioned the fourth guideline under WP:ELMAYBE
There is a wealth of information in this section of CAFCNA: Avalanche Owners Zone. I feel this alone is technical information beyond the scope of the article.
I appreciate the oppertunity of this discussion with you,
Todd amd1900mp 03:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrowUpAlready ( talk • contribs)
Thank You - amd1900mp ( talk) 04:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Good reading here. It leads to one question, We also qualify to add the link but if the page was reverted,why we're left out? We have the same accurate technical information to user-owner as the other website regardless of age. I had our name on here without a spamming tagline. It was just simple. Bluez71 ( talk) 22:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey guys, i happened to come by and noticed that our link was removed. chevyavalancheclub.com Are there new policy changes? Thank you for reading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluez71 ( talk • contribs) 00:10, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure that the option is for an 8.1 engine, not a 6.1. Unless of course my Chevy Avalanche owners manual is lying to me...
I can clear this up dude your owner's manual is not lying to you the Chevrolet Avalanche did have an 8.1 liter engine only on the 2500 series ICarly98 ( talk) 13:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
§Suggestion for defininton change in side bar from full size pickup truck to full size sport ulitity because thats what it states that it is in the main article
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Chevrolet Avalanche. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Chevrolet Avalanche. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 21:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This needs the gas mileage.
This sentence should be changed since the Avalanche is not technically a pickup.
No, it is not.
Sneakernets
09:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Yup, the avalanche is actually an SUV that looks like a truck. True pickups have a seperate cab and bed on the chassis. The Avalanche has a unified cab/bed design.
No, just as the Suburban is a truck-based station wagon, the Avalanche is a Suburban-based truck...so technically a truck-based truck, but that's what they wanted to build. A pickup truck has a bed, and it can be unibody...like the 1961-63 Ford F100.
74.104.189.176 (
talk)
02:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
The entire section is in the wrong spot, isn't it? It should be with the GMT800 section, not the GMT900 section, because it says the later models didn't have the problem. It also sounds like it was quoted from a GM excecutive when the problem first arose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.157.23.39 ( talk) 23:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Maybe the article should mention that the plastic cladding doesn't respond well to wax products. Car wax looks nasty when it gets on the plastic cladding. The best product I've used to circumvent this is Turtle Wax's Black Chrome. But after Turtle Wax stopped making Black Chrome, I've found that Mother's Back To Black is almost as good.
The [Edit]
'button's for the first three sections (firstgeneration, secondgeneration, and thirdgeneration) all are showing up in the wrong location under cladding problems. Anyway to fix this? --
$user log (
talk)
13:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I removed both forum links under WP:EL. Do not re-add the links, as you are aware of WP:EL and WP:3RR, which will apply if you add them.
Instead, talk it out. Come to this discussion to meet Wikipedia's standards. If you can't reach consensus, consider WP:DR. If not, a block for WP:3RR will be coming your way. tedder ( talk) 07:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
I understand your points of view Sable232 and apologize for violating the site policies. Based on what I read above I am allowed to add our link to the page and will do just that.
Thanks for your time,
Todd GrowUpAlready ( talk) 00:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Sorry Tedder, I thought this was resolved since there were no replies to Sable232’s post on 10/16. I added the link back to the article (four days later) based on Sable232’s statement: “Actually, since both those sites offer technical information beyond the scope of the article they ARE allowed.” I added the link to the Chevy Avalanche Fan Club of North America's offical site based on What to link
Todd amd1900mp 02:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrowUpAlready ( talk • contribs)
Tedder, Based on the "What to link" opening statement which reads;
There are several things that should be considered when adding an external link.
·Is the site content accessible to the reader? (Yes, no registration required)
·Is the site content proper in the context of the article (useful, tasteful, informative, factual, etc.)? (Yes)
·Is the link functional and likely to remain functional? (Yes, since 2001)
What Should Be Linked #1, 2 & 3.
And also as you mentioned the fourth guideline under WP:ELMAYBE
There is a wealth of information in this section of CAFCNA: Avalanche Owners Zone. I feel this alone is technical information beyond the scope of the article.
I appreciate the oppertunity of this discussion with you,
Todd amd1900mp 03:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrowUpAlready ( talk • contribs)
Thank You - amd1900mp ( talk) 04:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Good reading here. It leads to one question, We also qualify to add the link but if the page was reverted,why we're left out? We have the same accurate technical information to user-owner as the other website regardless of age. I had our name on here without a spamming tagline. It was just simple. Bluez71 ( talk) 22:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey guys, i happened to come by and noticed that our link was removed. chevyavalancheclub.com Are there new policy changes? Thank you for reading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluez71 ( talk • contribs) 00:10, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure that the option is for an 8.1 engine, not a 6.1. Unless of course my Chevy Avalanche owners manual is lying to me...
I can clear this up dude your owner's manual is not lying to you the Chevrolet Avalanche did have an 8.1 liter engine only on the 2500 series ICarly98 ( talk) 13:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
§Suggestion for defininton change in side bar from full size pickup truck to full size sport ulitity because thats what it states that it is in the main article
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Chevrolet Avalanche. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Chevrolet Avalanche. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 21:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)