This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am contesting renaming the Chetniks done with this diff using the following explanation: "simplifying to common name".
The above explanation is wrong because:
The result of the move request was: page moved. TonyBallioni ( talk) 15:58, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland order of battle → Chetnik order of battle – Per the WP:NAMINGCRITERIA, Chetnik is clearly a more recognisable description of the subject than Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland, which is much more obscure, uses the common name ( Chetnik is 0.0000006087 and Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland is 0.0000000137%) of the organisation that readers are likely to search for, precisely defines the subject and is no longer than necessary to distinguish it from Chetnik organisations in earlier wars. Disambiguation by war is consistent with other similar organisations such as Serbian Volunteer Corps (World War II). Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 04:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles."Chetniks" is the obviously the common name for the organisation .... and therefore it is also much more natural.....So, it is more concise, it is the common name, and it is more natural.There is no common name for the topic of this article. The term Chetniks have so many different meanings and encompass so many different military forces that it is far less common, natural, recognizable, precise and consistent name choice for this topic. The only advantage would be conciseness, which is not enough. -- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 20:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am contesting renaming the Chetniks done with this diff using the following explanation: "simplifying to common name".
The above explanation is wrong because:
The result of the move request was: page moved. TonyBallioni ( talk) 15:58, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland order of battle → Chetnik order of battle – Per the WP:NAMINGCRITERIA, Chetnik is clearly a more recognisable description of the subject than Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland, which is much more obscure, uses the common name ( Chetnik is 0.0000006087 and Yugoslav Army in the Fatherland is 0.0000000137%) of the organisation that readers are likely to search for, precisely defines the subject and is no longer than necessary to distinguish it from Chetnik organisations in earlier wars. Disambiguation by war is consistent with other similar organisations such as Serbian Volunteer Corps (World War II). Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 04:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles."Chetniks" is the obviously the common name for the organisation .... and therefore it is also much more natural.....So, it is more concise, it is the common name, and it is more natural.There is no common name for the topic of this article. The term Chetniks have so many different meanings and encompass so many different military forces that it is far less common, natural, recognizable, precise and consistent name choice for this topic. The only advantage would be conciseness, which is not enough. -- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 20:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)