Chestertown Armory is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by Guerillero Parlez Moi at 19:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article.
|
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Chestertown Armory appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 September 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
09:52, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
5x expanded by Guerillero ( talk). Self-nominated at 11:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC).
ALT 1 ... that Washington College plans on turning the Chestertown Armory into a bed and breakfast?
ALT 1a ... that Washington College is exploring turning the Chestertown Armory into a bed and breakfast?
ALT 2 ... that the Chestertown Armory is officially named after a Chestertown, Maryland resident who landed on Omaha Beach on D-Day?
ALT 3 ... that the Maryland Army National Guard used the Chestertown Armory from 1932 until it was declared surplus in 2005?
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Guerillero ( talk · contribs) 19:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Bruxton ( talk · contribs) 20:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
33% reviewed
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Yes | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Yes | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Yes | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Yes | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Chestertown Armory is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by Guerillero Parlez Moi at 19:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article.
|
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Chestertown Armory appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 September 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
09:52, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
5x expanded by Guerillero ( talk). Self-nominated at 11:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC).
ALT 1 ... that Washington College plans on turning the Chestertown Armory into a bed and breakfast?
ALT 1a ... that Washington College is exploring turning the Chestertown Armory into a bed and breakfast?
ALT 2 ... that the Chestertown Armory is officially named after a Chestertown, Maryland resident who landed on Omaha Beach on D-Day?
ALT 3 ... that the Maryland Army National Guard used the Chestertown Armory from 1932 until it was declared surplus in 2005?
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Guerillero ( talk · contribs) 19:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Bruxton ( talk · contribs) 20:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
33% reviewed
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Yes | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Yes | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Yes | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Yes | |
7. Overall assessment. |