This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: page moved — innotata ( Talk • Contribs) 23:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Law's Diving-goose →
Chendytes lawi —
Thanks for the move innotata. -- Kevmin ( talk) 23:14, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose this page be split into Chendytes and Chendytes lawi. There were two species of Chendytes, and Chendytes milleri now has its own page. For this page, 'tis time to split. Have one page for the genus as a whole and another page for C. lawi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach Varmitech ( talk • contribs) 23:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC) @ Dinoguy2:
The repeated use of "exploitation" is very loaded/subjective phrasing. The clear implication is that humans were overbearing predators destroying the ducks' populations, but if humans had been preying on Chendytes for over 8,000 years, then surely there must have been some level of stability in that relationship? 64.50.95.2 ( talk) 18:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: page moved — innotata ( Talk • Contribs) 23:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Law's Diving-goose →
Chendytes lawi —
Thanks for the move innotata. -- Kevmin ( talk) 23:14, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose this page be split into Chendytes and Chendytes lawi. There were two species of Chendytes, and Chendytes milleri now has its own page. For this page, 'tis time to split. Have one page for the genus as a whole and another page for C. lawi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach Varmitech ( talk • contribs) 23:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC) @ Dinoguy2:
The repeated use of "exploitation" is very loaded/subjective phrasing. The clear implication is that humans were overbearing predators destroying the ducks' populations, but if humans had been preying on Chendytes for over 8,000 years, then surely there must have been some level of stability in that relationship? 64.50.95.2 ( talk) 18:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)