Below are answers to
frequently asked questions about the corresponding page
Chelsea Manning. They address concerns, questions, and misconceptions which have repeatedly arisen on the talk page. Please feel free to change this material in light of new discussion.
This page was nominated for
deletion on 16 November 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was snow keep.
To view an answer, click the [show] link to the right of the question.
Q1: Why is this article titled Chelsea Manning?
A majority of sources now use the name "Chelsea" when referring to Manning which would make it the
common name. There has been consensus among editors since October 2013 that this name should be used.
Historically, the first
2013 formal move discussion closed, and a committee of three uninvolved and experienced admins determined the move to Chelsea Manning should be reverted back to Bradley. Discussions since that close upheld that waiting 30 days was a good idea and the time should be spent making the case for a new move discussion. In a
subsequent move discussion, consensus was against a proposal of "Private Manning" as the article title. A new discussion about
moving the article back to "Chelsea Manning" started on September 30 and was closed on October 8 with a consensus to move the article to "Chelsea Manning".
Q2: Why does the article refer to Manning as she?
MOS:IDENTITY says: "Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example 'man/woman', 'waiter/waitress', 'chairman/chairwoman') that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. [...] Direct quotations may need to be handled as exceptions (in some cases adjusting the portion used may reduce apparent contradictions, and ' [sic]' may be used where necessary)."
Q3: Shouldn't we insist on a legal name change before changing the title of the article?
Articles are titled based on the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Article titles, and are usually the name the subject is most commonly known by, which is not necessarily their
legal name; legal name usually has little bearing on the title of an article. A
long discussion in October 2013 concluded that the article title should be "Chelsea Manning".
The fact that Manning is transgender, and was a transgender inmate, a transgender soldier, etc, is notable and defining and has been discussed in multiple reliable sources (which are cited in the article). See
Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization for more information.
Q5: I feel that Wikipedia is being biased against (or towards) my beliefs here, what should I do?
Wikipedia policy mandates that articles reflect the content of
reliable sources and be written from a
neutral point of view, avoiding
advocating for any particular perspective. Minority ideas and opinions must not be given
undue weight or promotion in Wikipedia articles. It is impossible for coverage of real-world controversies to leave everyone happy – ideas change and adapt over time, and partisan viewpoints are typically entrenched and unable to self-assess bias – but seeking and maintaining neutrality is an ongoing process. Concerns over bias can be addressed with
bold editing following the
WP:BRD cycle or by starting a
civil and constructive discussion at this talk page to suggest article improvements.
Q6: Why does Wikipedia include Chelsea Manning's
deadname?
Wikipedia's guidelines say that we should include the birth name for a living transgender person in the lead sentence only if the person was notable under that name. This is the case for Chelsea Manning. By doing this, we ensure people who have only heard of Manning as her deadname can still find and recognize the article.
Below are answers to
frequently asked questions about the corresponding page
Chelsea Manning. They address concerns, questions, and misconceptions which have repeatedly arisen on the talk page. Please feel free to change this material in light of new discussion.
This page was nominated for
deletion on 16 November 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was snow keep.
To view an answer, click the [show] link to the right of the question.
Q1: Why is this article titled Chelsea Manning?
A majority of sources now use the name "Chelsea" when referring to Manning which would make it the
common name. There has been consensus among editors since October 2013 that this name should be used.
Historically, the first
2013 formal move discussion closed, and a committee of three uninvolved and experienced admins determined the move to Chelsea Manning should be reverted back to Bradley. Discussions since that close upheld that waiting 30 days was a good idea and the time should be spent making the case for a new move discussion. In a
subsequent move discussion, consensus was against a proposal of "Private Manning" as the article title. A new discussion about
moving the article back to "Chelsea Manning" started on September 30 and was closed on October 8 with a consensus to move the article to "Chelsea Manning".
Q2: Why does the article refer to Manning as she?
MOS:IDENTITY says: "Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example 'man/woman', 'waiter/waitress', 'chairman/chairwoman') that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. [...] Direct quotations may need to be handled as exceptions (in some cases adjusting the portion used may reduce apparent contradictions, and ' [sic]' may be used where necessary)."
Q3: Shouldn't we insist on a legal name change before changing the title of the article?
Articles are titled based on the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Article titles, and are usually the name the subject is most commonly known by, which is not necessarily their
legal name; legal name usually has little bearing on the title of an article. A
long discussion in October 2013 concluded that the article title should be "Chelsea Manning".
The fact that Manning is transgender, and was a transgender inmate, a transgender soldier, etc, is notable and defining and has been discussed in multiple reliable sources (which are cited in the article). See
Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization for more information.
Q5: I feel that Wikipedia is being biased against (or towards) my beliefs here, what should I do?
Wikipedia policy mandates that articles reflect the content of
reliable sources and be written from a
neutral point of view, avoiding
advocating for any particular perspective. Minority ideas and opinions must not be given
undue weight or promotion in Wikipedia articles. It is impossible for coverage of real-world controversies to leave everyone happy – ideas change and adapt over time, and partisan viewpoints are typically entrenched and unable to self-assess bias – but seeking and maintaining neutrality is an ongoing process. Concerns over bias can be addressed with
bold editing following the
WP:BRD cycle or by starting a
civil and constructive discussion at this talk page to suggest article improvements.
Q6: Why does Wikipedia include Chelsea Manning's
deadname?
Wikipedia's guidelines say that we should include the birth name for a living transgender person in the lead sentence only if the person was notable under that name. This is the case for Chelsea Manning. By doing this, we ensure people who have only heard of Manning as her deadname can still find and recognize the article.