This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Taxation ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Redirects needed

Cheek v. U.S. Cheek v. US 498 U.S. 192 498 US 192

I have elaborated on the holdings in this case in the article. The Court made a very distinct differentiation between arguments about constitutionality and all other arguments, resulting in two separate holdings. Yours, Famspear 22:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Perhaps someone with more credibility on this site than myself would be willing to add a section discussing Justice Scalia's concerns mentioned in his concurring opinion. He agreed with the holding, but disagreed rather strongly about the disallowance of the constitutionality arguments.