This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
ChatSecure article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... all of the other software in this class is listed here, and this came before all of them, is more feature-full and more freedom-respecting. Even more than that, to clarify the confusion of ownership with the Guardian Project, who have nothing to do with the project anymore, to whom this article was previously redirecting to. -- Miserlou ( talk) 15:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Furthermore, I'd like to state my belief that deletioninsts are absolutely killing Wikipedia. Miserlou ( talk) 15:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
In fact, this article doesn't event meet any of the _criteria_ for CSD: No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events) - it is _none_ of those things, this is an established, cutting-edge software project that has been operating since 2011, all of whose contemporaries are listed here. Please stop wasting everybody's time with incessant CSD nonsense. Miserlou ( talk)
@
Widefox: thanks for the mediation.
DrStrauss
talk
15:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
ChatSecure article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... all of the other software in this class is listed here, and this came before all of them, is more feature-full and more freedom-respecting. Even more than that, to clarify the confusion of ownership with the Guardian Project, who have nothing to do with the project anymore, to whom this article was previously redirecting to. -- Miserlou ( talk) 15:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Furthermore, I'd like to state my belief that deletioninsts are absolutely killing Wikipedia. Miserlou ( talk) 15:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
In fact, this article doesn't event meet any of the _criteria_ for CSD: No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events) - it is _none_ of those things, this is an established, cutting-edge software project that has been operating since 2011, all of whose contemporaries are listed here. Please stop wasting everybody's time with incessant CSD nonsense. Miserlou ( talk)
@
Widefox: thanks for the mediation.
DrStrauss
talk
15:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)