This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest merging 'Chartered Certified Accountant' with the 'ACCA' page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercunis ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 6 October 2006
The acronym FCCA is listed on this page (in fact, the wiki entry FCCA REDIRECTS to this page) and yet the article does not explain what the letters FCCA stand for. Can anyone help? Do people agree that this explanation should go in the article? Sounds like common sense to me. Wikikob 09:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
It would help to have some explicit statement about the relationship of this and the similarly named qualifications. (I'm thinking of the related article also. To someone from the US, such as myself, the article does not give the most basic information, which is who are these people in the first place.
And, as for many similar articles, I would strongly support merging in to the article for the association. The association may do other things than issue the certification, but is not the certification by far the most important, at least to the general public. DGG ( talk ) 19:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest merging 'Chartered Certified Accountant' with the 'ACCA' page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercunis ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 6 October 2006
The acronym FCCA is listed on this page (in fact, the wiki entry FCCA REDIRECTS to this page) and yet the article does not explain what the letters FCCA stand for. Can anyone help? Do people agree that this explanation should go in the article? Sounds like common sense to me. Wikikob 09:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
It would help to have some explicit statement about the relationship of this and the similarly named qualifications. (I'm thinking of the related article also. To someone from the US, such as myself, the article does not give the most basic information, which is who are these people in the first place.
And, as for many similar articles, I would strongly support merging in to the article for the association. The association may do other things than issue the certification, but is not the certification by far the most important, at least to the general public. DGG ( talk ) 19:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)