This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The reversion was pointless, as the reverted material had been migrated to the modern Charleston Gazette-Mail article. It would be nice if people would bother to know the subject before changing articles back to out of date material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamC ( talk • contribs) 13:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The reversion was pointless, as the reverted material had been migrated to the modern Charleston Gazette-Mail article. It would be nice if people would bother to know the subject before changing articles back to out of date material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamC ( talk • contribs) 13:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)