![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charles van Lerberghe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
T. E. Meeks is engaged in a campaign "to include more women and people of color in wikipedia", as well as to boost hits for an article he created yesterday. He does his cause no good by simply adding the name of his chosen composer, described as "a somewhat obscure figure" in the first source he cites, to a sentence beginning "Some single settings from Entrevisions have also been notable". This particular setting is not, or it would have been noted and performed more frequently. Sweetpool50 ( talk) 13:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
T. E. Meeks ( talk) 14:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
"Serious researchers" want to know accurate information. The song cited was from Chanson d'Ève, not Intimations. Such thoroughly slipshod work in the two edits I've encountered puts all your editing in doubt.
On another note, T. E. Meeks, WP is not the place to cram every snippet of information your happen to come across, instead of the subject's most notable highlights. I suggest you revisit your core article and give proper sources (and dates) for all the settings you cite; that's the proper and most useful place for your research. Sweetpool50 ( talk) 15:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charles van Lerberghe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
T. E. Meeks is engaged in a campaign "to include more women and people of color in wikipedia", as well as to boost hits for an article he created yesterday. He does his cause no good by simply adding the name of his chosen composer, described as "a somewhat obscure figure" in the first source he cites, to a sentence beginning "Some single settings from Entrevisions have also been notable". This particular setting is not, or it would have been noted and performed more frequently. Sweetpool50 ( talk) 13:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
T. E. Meeks ( talk) 14:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
"Serious researchers" want to know accurate information. The song cited was from Chanson d'Ève, not Intimations. Such thoroughly slipshod work in the two edits I've encountered puts all your editing in doubt.
On another note, T. E. Meeks, WP is not the place to cram every snippet of information your happen to come across, instead of the subject's most notable highlights. I suggest you revisit your core article and give proper sources (and dates) for all the settings you cite; that's the proper and most useful place for your research. Sweetpool50 ( talk) 15:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)