This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Charles Kirk (senior) →
Charles Kirk (architect) – Subject's prime claim to notability was as an architect, not as a senior. His same-named son does not have a Wikipedia entry and the father's vital dates in lead sentence resolve any confusion. The son is, in fact, mentioned under section header "Career" in the article's first full paragraph, but the entire article concerns the father, not the son.
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs)07:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)reply
There seems to be some confusion within the above question, "Why not move this article to
Charlie Kirk…" The article under discussion in this RM concerns a 19th-century English architect and builder named Charles Kirk who, as far as can be determined, was never referenced as "Charlie Kirk". The
Charles Kirk disambiguation page lists two men named "Charles Kirk" and two men named "Charlie Kirk", with none of the four men claimed as the
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over the other three men, thus there would be no need for addition of the parenthetical qualifier "(disambiguation)" to the main header.
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs)18:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm not entirely sure that the other discussion does apply here, though it would have been helpful to link to it in your nomination. Regarding the proposed change, I do think it's an improvement though obviously it would need to be changed again if the son ever gets his own article.
PC78 (
talk)
11:58, 28 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Charles Kirk (senior) →
Charles Kirk (architect) – Subject's prime claim to notability was as an architect, not as a senior. His same-named son does not have a Wikipedia entry and the father's vital dates in lead sentence resolve any confusion. The son is, in fact, mentioned under section header "Career" in the article's first full paragraph, but the entire article concerns the father, not the son.
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs)07:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)reply
There seems to be some confusion within the above question, "Why not move this article to
Charlie Kirk…" The article under discussion in this RM concerns a 19th-century English architect and builder named Charles Kirk who, as far as can be determined, was never referenced as "Charlie Kirk". The
Charles Kirk disambiguation page lists two men named "Charles Kirk" and two men named "Charlie Kirk", with none of the four men claimed as the
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over the other three men, thus there would be no need for addition of the parenthetical qualifier "(disambiguation)" to the main header.
Roman Spinner(talk •
contribs)18:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm not entirely sure that the other discussion does apply here, though it would have been helpful to link to it in your nomination. Regarding the proposed change, I do think it's an improvement though obviously it would need to be changed again if the son ever gets his own article.
PC78 (
talk)
11:58, 28 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.