This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Military history: Biography / British / European This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force British military history task force European military history task force

The article mentions an order being provided by the King of the Netherlands, which then links to the Military Order of William. It abbreviates (the same as the source does) I cannot find any other reference to this knighthood online, nor can I find this abbreviation in use to refer to this particular order. Might be that two orders are being confused? effeiets anders 14:41, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Boleyn: As you introduced this fact at creation (based on the source), perhaps you know more of the context. Thanks! effeiets anders 14:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Effeietsanders, the source I used was the 1911 Dictionary of National Biography, and if you can't find another source confirming this, it may be that the source is out-of-date/wrong. It's pretty reliable, but there are errors. Thanks, Boleyn ( talk) 19:08, 29 July 2017 (UTC) reply