This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Charge at Huj article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article overuses quotations. It is not a good idea to quote someone that explains the battle, the battle should be explained by the wikipedia text itself, using the quoted text as a reference. The 4º quote left an open quotation mark, and the following sentence has a period inside the quotation marks that should be outside.
The mentioned portrait "The Charge of the Warwickshire and Worcestershire Yeomanry at Huj", when was it painted? Most, but not all, of Lady Butler's works are from before 1923, and may be available for the {{ PD-US-1923-abroad}} licence. Cambalachero ( talk) 03:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Tha article states
Really? 170 troops equated to a single squadron in the British Army at this time. Even allowing for attrition... Hamish59 ( talk) 11:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
This post has been moved from RoslynSKP's talk page as it relates to this article.
Your edits to Charge at Huj have been reverted again. There is a WP:CONSENSUS at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Ottoman Turkish Empire wording dispute as you well know to use Turkish where context is clearly in favour of this term not just in one article as you are claiming. Turkish was the original wording not Ottoman which you changed it to. Jim Sweeney ( talk) 01:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
[moved from RoslynSKP talk page]
Roslyn; Just a note that you've made 3 reverts at Charge at Huj in the past 24-hours and to be careful not to breach WP:3RR. Please keep your discussions to the talk page for the time being, thanks. Ma®©usBritish{ chat} 02:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
As there appears to have been a consensus reached I have restored this edit - see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Arbitrary break. Anotherclown ( talk) 09:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charge at Huj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Charge at Huj article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article overuses quotations. It is not a good idea to quote someone that explains the battle, the battle should be explained by the wikipedia text itself, using the quoted text as a reference. The 4º quote left an open quotation mark, and the following sentence has a period inside the quotation marks that should be outside.
The mentioned portrait "The Charge of the Warwickshire and Worcestershire Yeomanry at Huj", when was it painted? Most, but not all, of Lady Butler's works are from before 1923, and may be available for the {{ PD-US-1923-abroad}} licence. Cambalachero ( talk) 03:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Tha article states
Really? 170 troops equated to a single squadron in the British Army at this time. Even allowing for attrition... Hamish59 ( talk) 11:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
This post has been moved from RoslynSKP's talk page as it relates to this article.
Your edits to Charge at Huj have been reverted again. There is a WP:CONSENSUS at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Ottoman Turkish Empire wording dispute as you well know to use Turkish where context is clearly in favour of this term not just in one article as you are claiming. Turkish was the original wording not Ottoman which you changed it to. Jim Sweeney ( talk) 01:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
[moved from RoslynSKP talk page]
Roslyn; Just a note that you've made 3 reverts at Charge at Huj in the past 24-hours and to be careful not to breach WP:3RR. Please keep your discussions to the talk page for the time being, thanks. Ma®©usBritish{ chat} 02:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
As there appears to have been a consensus reached I have restored this edit - see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Arbitrary break. Anotherclown ( talk) 09:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charge at Huj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)