![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
@ Johnnyconnorabc, Ambrosiawater, and Ambiederman: This is currently five stub articles and five readlinks that could be one article for the genus with a decent, sortable wikitable allowing a reader to compare the species. Is it at all likely that any of the species articles are going to become long enough to absolutely need an aritcle of their own? -- Paul ❬ talk❭ 10:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
@PaulCarpenter I agree with @Hyperik. However I think the gill raker count should be included because that's also a way to distinguish the Channichthys species. Johnnyconnorabc ( talk) 00:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Quetzal1964: A maximum adult length of 3 cm is unlikely; the FishBase entry was probably describing larval size. The Russian Wikipedia article states the maximum length as 31.1 cm. This reference ( http://www-zoology.univer.kharkov.ua/Personal/gennadiy/New-3-Channichthys-species-Shandikov-1995b.pdf) is a permanent dead link while two others (Andriyashev A.P. (1986). General overview of the bottom fish fauna of the Antarctic. In: Morphology and distribution of fishes of the Southern Ocean. Proceedings of Zool. Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, vol. 153, pp. 9-44 .) and (Andriyashev A.P., Neelov A.V. (1986): Zoogeographic zoning of the Antarctic region (by bottom fish). Atlas of Antarctica. T. 1. Map .) are unavailable online. You should be familiar with finding references; can you help? Johnnyconnorabc ( talk) 01:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
@ Johnnyconnorabc, Ambrosiawater, and Ambiederman: This is currently five stub articles and five readlinks that could be one article for the genus with a decent, sortable wikitable allowing a reader to compare the species. Is it at all likely that any of the species articles are going to become long enough to absolutely need an aritcle of their own? -- Paul ❬ talk❭ 10:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
@PaulCarpenter I agree with @Hyperik. However I think the gill raker count should be included because that's also a way to distinguish the Channichthys species. Johnnyconnorabc ( talk) 00:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Quetzal1964: A maximum adult length of 3 cm is unlikely; the FishBase entry was probably describing larval size. The Russian Wikipedia article states the maximum length as 31.1 cm. This reference ( http://www-zoology.univer.kharkov.ua/Personal/gennadiy/New-3-Channichthys-species-Shandikov-1995b.pdf) is a permanent dead link while two others (Andriyashev A.P. (1986). General overview of the bottom fish fauna of the Antarctic. In: Morphology and distribution of fishes of the Southern Ocean. Proceedings of Zool. Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, vol. 153, pp. 9-44 .) and (Andriyashev A.P., Neelov A.V. (1986): Zoogeographic zoning of the Antarctic region (by bottom fish). Atlas of Antarctica. T. 1. Map .) are unavailable online. You should be familiar with finding references; can you help? Johnnyconnorabc ( talk) 01:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)