This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
chandragupta 2 and his love life
chandragupta vikramaditya fell in love with a beautiful young princess called dhruvswamini who he had won over in a war against her father , the king of madra currently known as punjab but unfortunately while chandragupta was fighting in a war against the shakas his brother ramgupta took over the dynasty since their father had died of illness and chandragupta was unaware of this .he had also forced dhruvswamini to marry him which she did helplessly inspite of wanting to marry chandragupta.
later when chandragupta came back he realised this and went back to ayodhya where he ruled for about 5years until he got an opportunity to take revenge on ramgupta got back what belonged to him - the gupta kingdom as well as dhruvswamini.
chandragupta later on also married kubernaga in order to keep relationships with the nagas
this article is written by sharmin bhagwagar
WRITEN BY VIVEK SINGH —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
122.168.163.192 (
talk)
06:17, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
The current line: "India, have many interesting stories about King Vikramaditya, his guru named 'Manva-Patwa' and his queen(s)." Could we have some clarity? This line makes no sense. Cosmicforums ( talk) 04:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
The entire para about Vikramaditya's supposed inscription the Kaaba seems to be pesudohistorical junk. Is there a reliable source for this? All I can find is fringe theories on unreliable websites. utcursch | talk 15:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Sandrokottos was name used by the Greeks to refer to Chandragupta Maurya over 700 years earlier. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.164.104.208 ( talk) 10:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
chandragupta 2 is a lie, there was no any chandragupta 2 in history. vikramaditya father was Gandharva-sena and he was agnivanshi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.243.197.9 ( talk) 18:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chandragupta II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Reason: no synthesis please - the sources do not mention Chandragupta
The source regarding Kuntala inscription does mention chandragupta, the other two sources simply call arabian sea as western sea and not southern sea, i dont see any issues regarding that as well. Zombie gunner ( talk) 15:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
chandragupta 2 and his love life
chandragupta vikramaditya fell in love with a beautiful young princess called dhruvswamini who he had won over in a war against her father , the king of madra currently known as punjab but unfortunately while chandragupta was fighting in a war against the shakas his brother ramgupta took over the dynasty since their father had died of illness and chandragupta was unaware of this .he had also forced dhruvswamini to marry him which she did helplessly inspite of wanting to marry chandragupta.
later when chandragupta came back he realised this and went back to ayodhya where he ruled for about 5years until he got an opportunity to take revenge on ramgupta got back what belonged to him - the gupta kingdom as well as dhruvswamini.
chandragupta later on also married kubernaga in order to keep relationships with the nagas
this article is written by sharmin bhagwagar
WRITEN BY VIVEK SINGH —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
122.168.163.192 (
talk)
06:17, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
The current line: "India, have many interesting stories about King Vikramaditya, his guru named 'Manva-Patwa' and his queen(s)." Could we have some clarity? This line makes no sense. Cosmicforums ( talk) 04:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
The entire para about Vikramaditya's supposed inscription the Kaaba seems to be pesudohistorical junk. Is there a reliable source for this? All I can find is fringe theories on unreliable websites. utcursch | talk 15:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Sandrokottos was name used by the Greeks to refer to Chandragupta Maurya over 700 years earlier. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.164.104.208 ( talk) 10:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
chandragupta 2 is a lie, there was no any chandragupta 2 in history. vikramaditya father was Gandharva-sena and he was agnivanshi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.243.197.9 ( talk) 18:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chandragupta II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Reason: no synthesis please - the sources do not mention Chandragupta
The source regarding Kuntala inscription does mention chandragupta, the other two sources simply call arabian sea as western sea and not southern sea, i dont see any issues regarding that as well. Zombie gunner ( talk) 15:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)