This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"But the recent flourishing of Bangla bands in West Bengal was heralded by Chandrabindu" - I think this sentence should be removed. Some other bands like Bhoomi and Krosswindz had a lot to do with popularising Bangla Bands at the beginnning. I think Bhoomi was the first popular Bangla Band.-- DIGIwarez 16:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
As the history will indicate, there is a dispute concerning the inclusion in the summary of this:
It's weasel-worded (who gives this title to Mohiner Ghoraguli?), and generally uncited. (In its earlier forms it wasn't clearly relevant and offly worded, so at least it has improved in those respects.) The main disagreement over style concerns the non-standard separation by blank lines of entries in the list of external links. -- Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 19:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I think the line ("The recent flourishing of Bangla bands in West Bengal was heralded by Chandrabindu") needs to have a source or be removed. This line is definitely opinion, and should be credited to someone. Actually, what I found most bothersome was the first paragraph of "Criticisms." Who says their lyrics are shallow and/or hollow and the singing "very bad." And "all subsequent bands were created to cash in on the hype rather than from creative motivations." Whose opinions are these? There are a couple of articles linked in the references section, but little information seems to be taken from them. - DejahThoris 19:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
No-one has yet explained why a claim about a different band, which makes no reference to this band, is relevant or appropriate to this article, especially in the summary. -- Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 11:09, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
All that needs to be said is that, while they weren't the first Bangla band, they were the first band to popularise the music. Referring to a different band only to deny its importance is unnecessary, and when the reference has the problem of weasel words and no source, I don't see the point of insisting on it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mel Etitis ( talk • contribs)
How about something like
Kind of a compromise? - DejahThoris 03:06, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
This article was placed in RFC. I have edited it from a WP:NPOV. The following have been removed and placed on this page for the time being. If they are to be reinserted in the article, they need to be closely referenced with outside sources.
Tyrenius 02:41, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Why does Gadha (1998) link to Mace "This article is about the personal weapon. For its symbolical derivative, see ceremonial mace. For other uses, see Mace (disambiguation)." I would assume this is a mistake. -- Sweety Rose 20:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Chandrabindoo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 21:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I have corrected the band music URL in the infobox and I am suggesting a discussion on unnecessary bold letters for Bengali words specially in Discography section. -- Tito Dutta (Talk) 07:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chandrabindoo (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"But the recent flourishing of Bangla bands in West Bengal was heralded by Chandrabindu" - I think this sentence should be removed. Some other bands like Bhoomi and Krosswindz had a lot to do with popularising Bangla Bands at the beginnning. I think Bhoomi was the first popular Bangla Band.-- DIGIwarez 16:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
As the history will indicate, there is a dispute concerning the inclusion in the summary of this:
It's weasel-worded (who gives this title to Mohiner Ghoraguli?), and generally uncited. (In its earlier forms it wasn't clearly relevant and offly worded, so at least it has improved in those respects.) The main disagreement over style concerns the non-standard separation by blank lines of entries in the list of external links. -- Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 19:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I think the line ("The recent flourishing of Bangla bands in West Bengal was heralded by Chandrabindu") needs to have a source or be removed. This line is definitely opinion, and should be credited to someone. Actually, what I found most bothersome was the first paragraph of "Criticisms." Who says their lyrics are shallow and/or hollow and the singing "very bad." And "all subsequent bands were created to cash in on the hype rather than from creative motivations." Whose opinions are these? There are a couple of articles linked in the references section, but little information seems to be taken from them. - DejahThoris 19:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
No-one has yet explained why a claim about a different band, which makes no reference to this band, is relevant or appropriate to this article, especially in the summary. -- Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 11:09, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
All that needs to be said is that, while they weren't the first Bangla band, they were the first band to popularise the music. Referring to a different band only to deny its importance is unnecessary, and when the reference has the problem of weasel words and no source, I don't see the point of insisting on it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mel Etitis ( talk • contribs)
How about something like
Kind of a compromise? - DejahThoris 03:06, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
This article was placed in RFC. I have edited it from a WP:NPOV. The following have been removed and placed on this page for the time being. If they are to be reinserted in the article, they need to be closely referenced with outside sources.
Tyrenius 02:41, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Why does Gadha (1998) link to Mace "This article is about the personal weapon. For its symbolical derivative, see ceremonial mace. For other uses, see Mace (disambiguation)." I would assume this is a mistake. -- Sweety Rose 20:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Chandrabindoo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 21:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I have corrected the band music URL in the infobox and I am suggesting a discussion on unnecessary bold letters for Bengali words specially in Discography section. -- Tito Dutta (Talk) 07:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chandrabindoo (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)