![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I'm not sure which discussion thread the above were replies to, or how to find it, but it's making me rethink my merge tag. Instead of reverting my merge tag, I'll wait until an actual discussion develops here. I can draw a distinction between the chaff that is threshed and winnowed, and the bran that is milled off before grinding into flour, but I think the distinction is better drawn in a single article about both, and that the two are more likely to remain confused by people who read only one article about either of them. -- arkuat (talk) 07:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
"to rhyme with half"? Really? Not in my dialect (even ignoring the 'l' in half). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thirteenangrymen ( talk • contribs) 20:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Why is there a random paragraph about the warfare definition of it? Surely it should just have the disambiguation link and nothing else? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.169.52.102 ( talk) 16:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
There's still a big incongruous title saying "War". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikething ( talk • contribs) 00:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
The introduction of this article begins by describing chaff as "inedible", then in the following sentence explains that "In agriculture chaff is used as livestock fodder". I submit that the word "inedible" should be removed, or changed in some way to explain that it is not fit for human consumption. NinjaKid ( talk) 21:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Could another meaning be included here, eg: "To make fun of in a good-natured way; tease. v.intr." "To engage in playful or good-natured teasing, banter. n." "See Synonyms at banter." "See http://www.thefreedictionary.com/chaff" I'm sorry, I don't have the confidence to do it myself. Dawright12 ( talk) 10:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chaff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I'm not sure which discussion thread the above were replies to, or how to find it, but it's making me rethink my merge tag. Instead of reverting my merge tag, I'll wait until an actual discussion develops here. I can draw a distinction between the chaff that is threshed and winnowed, and the bran that is milled off before grinding into flour, but I think the distinction is better drawn in a single article about both, and that the two are more likely to remain confused by people who read only one article about either of them. -- arkuat (talk) 07:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
"to rhyme with half"? Really? Not in my dialect (even ignoring the 'l' in half). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thirteenangrymen ( talk • contribs) 20:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Why is there a random paragraph about the warfare definition of it? Surely it should just have the disambiguation link and nothing else? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.169.52.102 ( talk) 16:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
There's still a big incongruous title saying "War". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikething ( talk • contribs) 00:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
The introduction of this article begins by describing chaff as "inedible", then in the following sentence explains that "In agriculture chaff is used as livestock fodder". I submit that the word "inedible" should be removed, or changed in some way to explain that it is not fit for human consumption. NinjaKid ( talk) 21:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Could another meaning be included here, eg: "To make fun of in a good-natured way; tease. v.intr." "To engage in playful or good-natured teasing, banter. n." "See Synonyms at banter." "See http://www.thefreedictionary.com/chaff" I'm sorry, I don't have the confidence to do it myself. Dawright12 ( talk) 10:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chaff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)