![]() | Cetiosauriscus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 28, 2020. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
As a last note, the petition of Charig (1993) was done under Article 70b (misidentified type species). 68.4.61.237 ( talk) 18:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian
Upchurch and Martin (2003) could find no characters support referral of Cetiosaurus glymptonensis to Cetiosauriscus and considered it a distinct taxon of diplodocoid requiring a new genus name. Whitlock (2011), however, has taken a conservative position by assigning C. glymptonensis to Eusauropoda incertae sedis because he feels that the available evidence is insufficient to confirm the diplodocoid position of this taxon. Furthermore, Cetiosauriscus was recovered as a non-neosauropod eusauropod by Rauhut et. al. (2005) in their phylogenetic analysis of Brachytrachelopan. Ornithopsis greppini clearly represents a non-neosauropod eusauropod distinct from Cetiosauriscus (Schwarz et. al. 2007) but has not yet been given a new genus name.
Rauhut, O. W. M., Remes, K., Fechner, R., Cladera, G. & Puerta P. 2005. Discovery of a short-necked sauropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic period of Patagonia. Nature, 435, 670–672.
Schwarz, D., Meyer, C. A. & Wings, O. 2007. Revision of Cetiosauriscus greppini – new results and perspectives. Pp. 57–58 in J. Le Loeuff (ed.) Fifth Meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Palaeontologists Abstract Volume, Muse ́e des Dinosaures, Espe ́raza, France.
Upchurch, P. & Martin, J. 2003. The anatomy and taxonomy of Cetiosaurus (Saurischia, Sauropoda) from the Middle Jurassic of England. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23, 208–231.
Whitlock, J. A. 2011. A phylogenetic analysis of Diplodocoidea (Saurischia: Sauropoda). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 872–915. 68.4.61.168 ( talk) 15:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack ( talk · contribs) 17:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Review is coming. -- Jens Lallensack ( talk) 17:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
I fear here is still a lot of work to do before reaching GA. This dinosaur is poorly known, and little has been published. This means that it is absolutely necessary to include most if not all of the few studies that have been published. There are important studies that are not included yet, so the article is partly outdated.
I have to abort the review and fail the article for now, mostly because several of the sources do not contain the cited information. I strongly encourage you to keep working on the article and resubmit it when its ready. I can also sent you the sources I mentioned (except Heathcote & Upchruch 2003, we will need to ask in the Wikiproject Resource exchange for this one). -- Jens Lallensack ( talk) 19:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
{{
cite conference}}
: Unknown parameter |booktitle=
ignored (|book-title=
suggested) (
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help); line feed character in |booktitle=
at position 15 (
help); line feed character in |title=
at position 13 (
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help); line feed character in |coauthors=
at position 4 (
help); line feed character in |journal=
at position 12 (
help); line feed character in |title=
at position 59 (
help)
{{
cite book}}
: line feed character in |title=
at position 12 (
help)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 06:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
The article possessed a handful of minor grammatical errors when I began this review, but nothing I was not able to fix. Aside from that it follows the policies on prose, content and structure, and with my modifications, grammar.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
14:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
The article uses a sizable quantity of reliable, published sources. No original reasearch looks to have been incorporated, and the content is laden with frequent citations.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
14:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
The article seems to cover all aspects of the topic which are relevant for encyclopedic inclusion. No irrelevant details appear to have been applied.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
14:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
The article does not demonstrate any bias towards or against its subject.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
14:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Looking at the edit history as far back as October, none of the editing which has occurred since then appears disruptive in any way.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
06:26, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The images are all validly licensed and do not violate any fair use-related laws. They also serve clear and relevant informative and illustrative purposes.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
06:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
With the above mentioned grammatical tweaks, I now feel this article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations!
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
14:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cetiosauriscus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Article says:
the cartilage caps of sauropods may have been larger than predicted by an Alligator CCF
Can we please clarify the meaning of "CCF"?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.122.51.140 ( talk) 19:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Article says
... the cartilage caps extended fairly far onto the metaphysics of some long bones ...
We don't really want "metaphysics" here, do we? Can somebody fix this?
-- 189.122.51.140 ( talk) 19:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
This snippet of text seems incorrect or unclear: "The coracoid is incomplete, but enough is preserved to show it is rectangular, and longer, at 35 cm (14 in), than it is wide—38 cm (15 in)"
Are the measurements mixed up? Ubilaz ( talk) 22:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Cetiosauriscus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 28, 2020. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
As a last note, the petition of Charig (1993) was done under Article 70b (misidentified type species). 68.4.61.237 ( talk) 18:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian
Upchurch and Martin (2003) could find no characters support referral of Cetiosaurus glymptonensis to Cetiosauriscus and considered it a distinct taxon of diplodocoid requiring a new genus name. Whitlock (2011), however, has taken a conservative position by assigning C. glymptonensis to Eusauropoda incertae sedis because he feels that the available evidence is insufficient to confirm the diplodocoid position of this taxon. Furthermore, Cetiosauriscus was recovered as a non-neosauropod eusauropod by Rauhut et. al. (2005) in their phylogenetic analysis of Brachytrachelopan. Ornithopsis greppini clearly represents a non-neosauropod eusauropod distinct from Cetiosauriscus (Schwarz et. al. 2007) but has not yet been given a new genus name.
Rauhut, O. W. M., Remes, K., Fechner, R., Cladera, G. & Puerta P. 2005. Discovery of a short-necked sauropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic period of Patagonia. Nature, 435, 670–672.
Schwarz, D., Meyer, C. A. & Wings, O. 2007. Revision of Cetiosauriscus greppini – new results and perspectives. Pp. 57–58 in J. Le Loeuff (ed.) Fifth Meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Palaeontologists Abstract Volume, Muse ́e des Dinosaures, Espe ́raza, France.
Upchurch, P. & Martin, J. 2003. The anatomy and taxonomy of Cetiosaurus (Saurischia, Sauropoda) from the Middle Jurassic of England. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23, 208–231.
Whitlock, J. A. 2011. A phylogenetic analysis of Diplodocoidea (Saurischia: Sauropoda). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 872–915. 68.4.61.168 ( talk) 15:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack ( talk · contribs) 17:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Review is coming. -- Jens Lallensack ( talk) 17:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
I fear here is still a lot of work to do before reaching GA. This dinosaur is poorly known, and little has been published. This means that it is absolutely necessary to include most if not all of the few studies that have been published. There are important studies that are not included yet, so the article is partly outdated.
I have to abort the review and fail the article for now, mostly because several of the sources do not contain the cited information. I strongly encourage you to keep working on the article and resubmit it when its ready. I can also sent you the sources I mentioned (except Heathcote & Upchruch 2003, we will need to ask in the Wikiproject Resource exchange for this one). -- Jens Lallensack ( talk) 19:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
{{
cite conference}}
: Unknown parameter |booktitle=
ignored (|book-title=
suggested) (
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help); line feed character in |booktitle=
at position 15 (
help); line feed character in |title=
at position 13 (
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help); line feed character in |coauthors=
at position 4 (
help); line feed character in |journal=
at position 12 (
help); line feed character in |title=
at position 59 (
help)
{{
cite book}}
: line feed character in |title=
at position 12 (
help)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 06:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
The article possessed a handful of minor grammatical errors when I began this review, but nothing I was not able to fix. Aside from that it follows the policies on prose, content and structure, and with my modifications, grammar.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
14:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
The article uses a sizable quantity of reliable, published sources. No original reasearch looks to have been incorporated, and the content is laden with frequent citations.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
14:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
The article seems to cover all aspects of the topic which are relevant for encyclopedic inclusion. No irrelevant details appear to have been applied.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
14:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
The article does not demonstrate any bias towards or against its subject.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
14:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Looking at the edit history as far back as October, none of the editing which has occurred since then appears disruptive in any way.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
06:26, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The images are all validly licensed and do not violate any fair use-related laws. They also serve clear and relevant informative and illustrative purposes.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
06:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
With the above mentioned grammatical tweaks, I now feel this article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations!
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
14:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cetiosauriscus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:28, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Article says:
the cartilage caps of sauropods may have been larger than predicted by an Alligator CCF
Can we please clarify the meaning of "CCF"?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.122.51.140 ( talk) 19:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Article says
... the cartilage caps extended fairly far onto the metaphysics of some long bones ...
We don't really want "metaphysics" here, do we? Can somebody fix this?
-- 189.122.51.140 ( talk) 19:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
This snippet of text seems incorrect or unclear: "The coracoid is incomplete, but enough is preserved to show it is rectangular, and longer, at 35 cm (14 in), than it is wide—38 cm (15 in)"
Are the measurements mixed up? Ubilaz ( talk) 22:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)