This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I've moved this page from Mesencephalic duct to Cerebral aqueduct. Cerebral aqueduct is used far more often than mesencephalic duct in the texts I've come across (e.g. Barr's The Human Nervous System: An anatomical viewpoint) and Google reports a usage of 10:1 in favor of cerebral aqueduct as well. -- David Iberri ( talk) 16:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Look at the first (left side) two images in the image gallery; they show the same view but the captions disagree re which plane, coronal plane or transverse plane. -- Una Smith ( talk) 05:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I am about to undo a series of IP edits and would like to explain why. I'm sure the edits were made in good faith, but they can't stand as is. For one thing, the edits converted a good wikilink into a red link; but that's minor. More importantly the edits add assertions based on a source from 1973, an article that was speculative even then. This needs a more recent authoritative source if it is going to stand. Looie496 ( talk) 13:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Aquaduct of Sulvius. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 11#Aquaduct of Sulvius until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I've moved this page from Mesencephalic duct to Cerebral aqueduct. Cerebral aqueduct is used far more often than mesencephalic duct in the texts I've come across (e.g. Barr's The Human Nervous System: An anatomical viewpoint) and Google reports a usage of 10:1 in favor of cerebral aqueduct as well. -- David Iberri ( talk) 16:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Look at the first (left side) two images in the image gallery; they show the same view but the captions disagree re which plane, coronal plane or transverse plane. -- Una Smith ( talk) 05:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I am about to undo a series of IP edits and would like to explain why. I'm sure the edits were made in good faith, but they can't stand as is. For one thing, the edits converted a good wikilink into a red link; but that's minor. More importantly the edits add assertions based on a source from 1973, an article that was speculative even then. This needs a more recent authoritative source if it is going to stand. Looie496 ( talk) 13:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Aquaduct of Sulvius. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 11#Aquaduct of Sulvius until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)