 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Neobuxbaumia polylopha page were merged into Cephalocereus polylophus. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Some relevant material from Neobuxbaumia polylopha, a synonym of Cephalocereus polylophus, has been added here before the former was made a redirect. An issue is that some other material that might be relevant is sourced to
- Nobel, Park (2002). Cacti. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 98. ISBN 0-520-23157-0.
but right now the URLs given produce the message "This item is no longer available. Items may be taken down for various reasons, including by decision of the uploader or due to a violation of our Terms of Use." As I can't access the source to see if it has been properly used, I haven't used it in the merger. Peter coxhead ( talk) 17:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| The contents of the Neobuxbaumia polylopha page were merged into Cephalocereus polylophus. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Some relevant material from Neobuxbaumia polylopha, a synonym of Cephalocereus polylophus, has been added here before the former was made a redirect. An issue is that some other material that might be relevant is sourced to
- Nobel, Park (2002). Cacti. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 98. ISBN 0-520-23157-0.
but right now the URLs given produce the message "This item is no longer available. Items may be taken down for various reasons, including by decision of the uploader or due to a violation of our Terms of Use." As I can't access the source to see if it has been properly used, I haven't used it in the merger. Peter coxhead ( talk) 17:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)