This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Atlas Network was copied or moved into Centre for Independent Studies. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Australia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
"It advocates for Classical liberal economic and conservative[citation needed] social policies."
I'd argue that this statement is factually incorrect, as I have attended CIS events, where drug legalisation was a discussion topic. I'd hardly consider this to be socially conservative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.167.190.133 ( talk) 03:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Added in liberty and society conferece - www.libertyandsociety.org is the address
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Centre for Independent Studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:15, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Is the adjective "liberal" in this article being used with the same meaning as it has in the US, or in the sense of the values of Australia's Liberal Party? Vaughan Pratt ( talk) 04:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
This article cites it's own subject far too often. I've removed a bunch of fancrufty claims, unverifiable claims...and one claim linked to a fringe socialist site!...this article certainly read like it was written by a member of the CIS (with the exception of that wacky socialist citation, lol). We should not me citing CIS or any of it's contributors/members, ideally and certainly not fringe socialist blogs - as per WP:RELIABLE. Reliable secondary sources are the best (academia, mainstream news etc). Using the CIS to cite an article about the CIS is dodgy...as per WP:MANDY, they would say great things about themselves. Tambor de Tocino ( talk) 01:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Atlas Network was copied or moved into Centre for Independent Studies. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Australia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
"It advocates for Classical liberal economic and conservative[citation needed] social policies."
I'd argue that this statement is factually incorrect, as I have attended CIS events, where drug legalisation was a discussion topic. I'd hardly consider this to be socially conservative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.167.190.133 ( talk) 03:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Added in liberty and society conferece - www.libertyandsociety.org is the address
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Centre for Independent Studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:15, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Is the adjective "liberal" in this article being used with the same meaning as it has in the US, or in the sense of the values of Australia's Liberal Party? Vaughan Pratt ( talk) 04:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
This article cites it's own subject far too often. I've removed a bunch of fancrufty claims, unverifiable claims...and one claim linked to a fringe socialist site!...this article certainly read like it was written by a member of the CIS (with the exception of that wacky socialist citation, lol). We should not me citing CIS or any of it's contributors/members, ideally and certainly not fringe socialist blogs - as per WP:RELIABLE. Reliable secondary sources are the best (academia, mainstream news etc). Using the CIS to cite an article about the CIS is dodgy...as per WP:MANDY, they would say great things about themselves. Tambor de Tocino ( talk) 01:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)