![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 21 November 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Central Bank of Brazil to Banco Central do Brasil (Brazilian central bank). The result of the discussion was consensus against move. |
Hi. Wouldn't this entry be better at Brazilian Central Bank? This would appear to be a more normal form by which the institution would be addressed in English. This being the English-language encyclopedia, we should minimize articles with titles in other languages. The present name, in Portuguese, would be better as a redirect page to the entry in English (which would be done automatically when the page is moved). Thoughts? Regards, Redux 05:59, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus is against the suggested page title. No prejudice against a new RM after a week for alternate title suggested in the discussion below (Banco Central do Brasil). Regards, —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 08:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Central Bank of Brazil → Banco Central do Brasil (Brazilian central bank) – correct designation by displaying the name in the original language (Portuguese) while providing a translation into english that will clarify the content of the article to english native and no native speakers. César A. O. R. ( talk) 15:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved Sceptre ( talk) 03:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Central Bank of Brazil →
Banco Central do Brasil – Institution´s legal name as written in its official registration documents.
200.218.214.80 (
talk)
13:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
and the fact that it was submitted by an anonymous coward (maybe so that the actual submitter can vote for it) doesn't help it.if you want to make an accusation of sockpuppetry, WP:SPI is over there. In the absence of any evidence, this is an unnecessary personal attack and you should retract it. In this case it seems the issue is simply that the nominator is an inexperienced editor and didn't notice their login cookie expired, and anyway there is no requirement that an editor create an account to participate at WP:RM. 61.239.39.90 ( talk) 03:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 21 November 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Central Bank of Brazil to Banco Central do Brasil (Brazilian central bank). The result of the discussion was consensus against move. |
Hi. Wouldn't this entry be better at Brazilian Central Bank? This would appear to be a more normal form by which the institution would be addressed in English. This being the English-language encyclopedia, we should minimize articles with titles in other languages. The present name, in Portuguese, would be better as a redirect page to the entry in English (which would be done automatically when the page is moved). Thoughts? Regards, Redux 05:59, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus is against the suggested page title. No prejudice against a new RM after a week for alternate title suggested in the discussion below (Banco Central do Brasil). Regards, —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 08:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Central Bank of Brazil → Banco Central do Brasil (Brazilian central bank) – correct designation by displaying the name in the original language (Portuguese) while providing a translation into english that will clarify the content of the article to english native and no native speakers. César A. O. R. ( talk) 15:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved Sceptre ( talk) 03:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Central Bank of Brazil →
Banco Central do Brasil – Institution´s legal name as written in its official registration documents.
200.218.214.80 (
talk)
13:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
and the fact that it was submitted by an anonymous coward (maybe so that the actual submitter can vote for it) doesn't help it.if you want to make an accusation of sockpuppetry, WP:SPI is over there. In the absence of any evidence, this is an unnecessary personal attack and you should retract it. In this case it seems the issue is simply that the nominator is an inexperienced editor and didn't notice their login cookie expired, and anyway there is no requirement that an editor create an account to participate at WP:RM. 61.239.39.90 ( talk) 03:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)