This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics: Libertarianism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance). Organizations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The document referred to by the "Institute for the Study of Academic Racism..." link is over eight years old, and seems to be out of date. I propose to delete the link. Lou Sander 02:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Center for Individual Rights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071123085906/http://www.mediatransparency.org:80/recipientprofile.php?recipientID=57 to http://www.mediatransparency.org/recipientprofile.php?recipientID=57
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060622191127/http://salon.com:80/it/feature/1999/03/17featurea2.html to http://www.salon.com/it/feature/1999/03/17featurea2.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080217222254/http://www.thenation.com:80/doc/19990308/flanders to http://www.thenation.com/doc/19990308/flanders
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070811114831/http://www.nationalreview.com:80/kurtz/kurtz080902.asp to http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz080902.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC) reply

The lede needs rework re: "The center is officially non-partisan"

The CIR itself states that it is nonpartesan, but argues majorly in favour of conservative causes and was founded by and is run by avowed conservatives.

2603:7080:8F02:2B11:98A3:4835:2C5F:272C ( talk) 15:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply