![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article mentions Globo and Record censored "their own work". It doesn't make sense, saying some institution censors its own voice. If you freely decide not to say something you were not censored.
I think the whole "Self-censorship" section should be removed, as it's a contradiction in its own name.
-- Tiago Rinck Caveden ( talk) 20:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
I took the freedom of removing an obvious troll. "The lack of internet censorship" As a brazilian i found it offending since he stated that we shouldn't be allowed to access it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.1.59.224 ( talk) 18:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
The citation given does not state the prohibition of anonymity is only for journalists. As far as I understand it, even internet anonymity is prohibited, although I haven't seen this enforced. Considering public opinion of internet freedom of speech and the blogs bluring the line between journalists and non-journalists, I find this important. Even being a brazilian, I am not a lawyer, so I don't really know, if any of you have any lawyer info that anonyymity is only prohibited for journalists, yay! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.123.138.55 ( talk) 03:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't think Marcos Cintra was a congressman when the twitter ban was applied. But he was one before. I don't know if this was what the author meant, but if it was, i believe it should be stated more clearly. 179.235.198.79 ( talk) 21:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
The censorship in Brazil is happening in the current management the Lula president and its nomimnees in the STF(Judicial). 2804:14C:5BC1:98AB:1400:B9E5:CB1E:1524 ( talk) 07:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article mentions Globo and Record censored "their own work". It doesn't make sense, saying some institution censors its own voice. If you freely decide not to say something you were not censored.
I think the whole "Self-censorship" section should be removed, as it's a contradiction in its own name.
-- Tiago Rinck Caveden ( talk) 20:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
I took the freedom of removing an obvious troll. "The lack of internet censorship" As a brazilian i found it offending since he stated that we shouldn't be allowed to access it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.1.59.224 ( talk) 18:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
The citation given does not state the prohibition of anonymity is only for journalists. As far as I understand it, even internet anonymity is prohibited, although I haven't seen this enforced. Considering public opinion of internet freedom of speech and the blogs bluring the line between journalists and non-journalists, I find this important. Even being a brazilian, I am not a lawyer, so I don't really know, if any of you have any lawyer info that anonyymity is only prohibited for journalists, yay! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.123.138.55 ( talk) 03:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't think Marcos Cintra was a congressman when the twitter ban was applied. But he was one before. I don't know if this was what the author meant, but if it was, i believe it should be stated more clearly. 179.235.198.79 ( talk) 21:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
The censorship in Brazil is happening in the current management the Lula president and its nomimnees in the STF(Judicial). 2804:14C:5BC1:98AB:1400:B9E5:CB1E:1524 ( talk) 07:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)