This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Celestial (comics) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since the Celestials conduct there experiments on behalf of the Abstracts, does that make the Watchers the enemies of the Abstracts? For some reason I dont imagine the Abstracts having enemies.
Wasn't there a Celestial inside the Earth in Earth X? Was he realted to vibranium?
I remember a Celestial being inside Earth X. And I remember they traveled to alternate Earths to warn them of Celestials inside of them. But does that mean there's a Celestial inside Earth 616? -- AlGorup 14:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
There was an early issue of X-factor where the team is on a planet about to be judged by Arishem. The planet is teeming with mutants , Jean Grey channels the combined power of the inhabitants to destroy Arishems Hand as he judges them unworthy. The celestials then leave as the locals have proved themselves.
Also there was a Thor story dealing with Ego the living planet which was shown to be the developing stage of a new celestial. Hercules was consumed during the process. Cryonic101 14:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
i think this was the black galaxy saga-- Princekilderkin ( talk) 23:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
I wonder if this article should be organized according to the comics history of the Celestials, i.e. with Kirby's work first, then the later additions of other writers and artists. As it is now, the article might be confusing to a newcomer. I think it would be worthwhile doing this for all Eternals articles. Biff Loman 14:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
how in the hell did sue storm crack a celestials armor...when even thor couldn't?
A great deal of text was removed from this article recently, as seen here: [1]
You know you're just accusing said user without proof. I don't know if the same style means same person. Request checkuser and then you see if same person. That's my take on things. Brian Boru is awesome 17:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Asgardian 07:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Image:Scathan2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 10:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Exitar2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:DreamingCelestial.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:AshematheListener.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:OneAboveAll.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb ( talk) 16:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
The sentence The cosmic cube named Kubik claimed they were "many orders of magnitude" above itself and another powerful entity able to create new realities, the Beyonder. is not necessary as there are several examples present that demonstrate what the characters are capable of, and it is also not appropriate as it is a claim by a fictional character about other fictional characters. Trying to argue a case about who is more powerful than whom is fruitless. Much like debating the merits of an equation in which differing numbers are multiplied by zero, as the result was always be zero. The characters aren't real.
Said characters power levels also go up and down depending on the writer, leading to inconsistencies. Galactus is a classic example of this. It is therefore best to just adhere to a description of what they can do, as opposed to whether they can do it better or worse than another character. After all, the article on Quicksilver doesn't have a section stating who he is faster or slower than on the superspeed scale.
The overall focus is that character or group, not everyone else and how they relate to the original.
Regards Asgardian ( talk) 07:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Celestial (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:20, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
So um, is he a Celestial? He's been referred to as a space-god, and he's capable of virtually anything, and he's huge...Or he's an anti-Celestial? This last part technically still makes him one. 92.114.148.141 ( talk) 18:41, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
You're getting two different entities with exact the exact same named mixed up. Bring back The One Above All's (God's) original entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:9188:B733:4C54:DCE9:B0B1:49CA ( talk) 20:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Fictional history's third paragraph includes the sentence
So, what was nearly destroyed? The bolded text is sheer gibberish, probably from an editing error, perhaps one or more cut-and-paste errors. Thnidu ( talk) 02:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
As I enter this wikitext, it is appearing in normal sans-serif font as if it were finished display text, not the monospace typewriter-like font (Courier New?) that editing work always appears in until previewed, and then when published. I first noticed this peculiar behavior when entering the talk section immediately before this one, #Gibberish. Perhaps it is related to the template mentioned in small type at the top of this talk page when viewed as a wiki page but not when adding a section. I do not recall ever seeing this kind of notice before:
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Celestial (comics) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since the Celestials conduct there experiments on behalf of the Abstracts, does that make the Watchers the enemies of the Abstracts? For some reason I dont imagine the Abstracts having enemies.
Wasn't there a Celestial inside the Earth in Earth X? Was he realted to vibranium?
I remember a Celestial being inside Earth X. And I remember they traveled to alternate Earths to warn them of Celestials inside of them. But does that mean there's a Celestial inside Earth 616? -- AlGorup 14:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
There was an early issue of X-factor where the team is on a planet about to be judged by Arishem. The planet is teeming with mutants , Jean Grey channels the combined power of the inhabitants to destroy Arishems Hand as he judges them unworthy. The celestials then leave as the locals have proved themselves.
Also there was a Thor story dealing with Ego the living planet which was shown to be the developing stage of a new celestial. Hercules was consumed during the process. Cryonic101 14:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
i think this was the black galaxy saga-- Princekilderkin ( talk) 23:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
I wonder if this article should be organized according to the comics history of the Celestials, i.e. with Kirby's work first, then the later additions of other writers and artists. As it is now, the article might be confusing to a newcomer. I think it would be worthwhile doing this for all Eternals articles. Biff Loman 14:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
how in the hell did sue storm crack a celestials armor...when even thor couldn't?
A great deal of text was removed from this article recently, as seen here: [1]
You know you're just accusing said user without proof. I don't know if the same style means same person. Request checkuser and then you see if same person. That's my take on things. Brian Boru is awesome 17:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Asgardian 07:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Image:Scathan2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 10:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Exitar2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:DreamingCelestial.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:AshematheListener.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:OneAboveAll.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb ( talk) 16:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
The sentence The cosmic cube named Kubik claimed they were "many orders of magnitude" above itself and another powerful entity able to create new realities, the Beyonder. is not necessary as there are several examples present that demonstrate what the characters are capable of, and it is also not appropriate as it is a claim by a fictional character about other fictional characters. Trying to argue a case about who is more powerful than whom is fruitless. Much like debating the merits of an equation in which differing numbers are multiplied by zero, as the result was always be zero. The characters aren't real.
Said characters power levels also go up and down depending on the writer, leading to inconsistencies. Galactus is a classic example of this. It is therefore best to just adhere to a description of what they can do, as opposed to whether they can do it better or worse than another character. After all, the article on Quicksilver doesn't have a section stating who he is faster or slower than on the superspeed scale.
The overall focus is that character or group, not everyone else and how they relate to the original.
Regards Asgardian ( talk) 07:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Celestial (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:20, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
So um, is he a Celestial? He's been referred to as a space-god, and he's capable of virtually anything, and he's huge...Or he's an anti-Celestial? This last part technically still makes him one. 92.114.148.141 ( talk) 18:41, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
You're getting two different entities with exact the exact same named mixed up. Bring back The One Above All's (God's) original entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:9188:B733:4C54:DCE9:B0B1:49CA ( talk) 20:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Fictional history's third paragraph includes the sentence
So, what was nearly destroyed? The bolded text is sheer gibberish, probably from an editing error, perhaps one or more cut-and-paste errors. Thnidu ( talk) 02:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
As I enter this wikitext, it is appearing in normal sans-serif font as if it were finished display text, not the monospace typewriter-like font (Courier New?) that editing work always appears in until previewed, and then when published. I first noticed this peculiar behavior when entering the talk section immediately before this one, #Gibberish. Perhaps it is related to the template mentioned in small type at the top of this talk page when viewed as a wiki page but not when adding a section. I do not recall ever seeing this kind of notice before: