The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@
Zackmann08: Many thanks for taking care of those. This week, am slightly swamped with other commitments but I will get back to the article & its Review as soon as I can. Just don't want anyone to think I had forgotten about it.
Shearonink (
talk)
19:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Any further comments on other possible issues and the article's status are on hold for a few days due to other commitments and also pending a few more readthroughs.
Shearonink (
talk)
19:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. This article was previously nominated for GA status:
Talk:Cedar Fire (2003)/GA1. Its structure, wording, citation issues have all been improved and cleared-up since then. I particularly commend
Zackmann08 for their writing concerning the aftermath of the fire and the various controversies as well as fixing all the various referencing issues. I am certain there are some improvements that could be made but at this time I cannot think of any. Nicely-done.
Shearonink (
talk)
16:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@
Zackmann08: Many thanks for taking care of those. This week, am slightly swamped with other commitments but I will get back to the article & its Review as soon as I can. Just don't want anyone to think I had forgotten about it.
Shearonink (
talk)
19:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Any further comments on other possible issues and the article's status are on hold for a few days due to other commitments and also pending a few more readthroughs.
Shearonink (
talk)
19:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. This article was previously nominated for GA status:
Talk:Cedar Fire (2003)/GA1. Its structure, wording, citation issues have all been improved and cleared-up since then. I particularly commend
Zackmann08 for their writing concerning the aftermath of the fire and the various controversies as well as fixing all the various referencing issues. I am certain there are some improvements that could be made but at this time I cannot think of any. Nicely-done.
Shearonink (
talk)
16:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.