From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2024

I want to propose a change in the evidence section. In paragraph two, sentence three, it is stated:

"The prosecution called software designer John Dennis Bradley, who testified that, based on a program he used to recover deleted searches, someone using the Anthony computer — he could not specify who — had searched for "chloroform" 84 times.[74] (After the trial, Bradley publicly reported that this number was an error attributable to a bug in his program, and that the computer, in fact, contained only one search for "chloroform".)"

The information in the parenthesis is too relevant to be an afterthought in parenthesis. I propose it should be changed as below, or something similar:

"The prosecution called software designer John Dennis Bradley, who testified that, based on a program he designed to recover deleted searches, someone using the Anthony computer — who could not be specified — had searched for "chloroform" 84 times[74]. Since the trial, Bradley has publicly reported that this number was an error attributable to a bug in his program, and that the computer, in fact, contained only one search for "chloroform". Originalpyromaniac ( talk) 03:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2024

I want to propose a change in the evidence section. In paragraph two, sentence three, it is stated:

"The prosecution called software designer John Dennis Bradley, who testified that, based on a program he used to recover deleted searches, someone using the Anthony computer — he could not specify who — had searched for "chloroform" 84 times.[74] (After the trial, Bradley publicly reported that this number was an error attributable to a bug in his program, and that the computer, in fact, contained only one search for "chloroform".)"

The information in the parenthesis is too relevant to be an afterthought in parenthesis. I propose it should be changed as below, or something similar:

"The prosecution called software designer John Dennis Bradley, who testified that, based on a program he designed to recover deleted searches, someone using the Anthony computer — who could not be specified — had searched for "chloroform" 84 times[74]. Since the trial, Bradley has publicly reported that this number was an error attributable to a bug in his program, and that the computer, in fact, contained only one search for "chloroform". Originalpyromaniac ( talk) 03:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook