 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
If you heard it on the radio, shouldn't it be caveat auditor'?
I saw that too. Fixed. -- zandperl 15:12, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/15/wikipedia_can_damage_your_grades/ "Slumming it with Jimbo
So now the second line of defense takes prominence (we ran up a a taxonomy of popular Wikipedians' whinges here last year) - and it's a variation on caveat lector. " Mathiastck 18:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 | This page has been
transwikied to
Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here ( logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
-- CopyToWiktionaryBot 02:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Is this site worth mentioning in relation to this page?
Sorry if it's not, this is my first time talking on here so be gentle...
- Ha! I used to love that web comic. Not sure if it is worth mentioning though, as I'm not deep enough into the Wikipedia editing front line to know. 2607:FCC8:9306:C400:7D7C:BBD7:4465:8663 ( talk) 17:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
If you heard it on the radio, shouldn't it be caveat auditor'?
I saw that too. Fixed. -- zandperl 15:12, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/15/wikipedia_can_damage_your_grades/ "Slumming it with Jimbo
So now the second line of defense takes prominence (we ran up a a taxonomy of popular Wikipedians' whinges here last year) - and it's a variation on caveat lector. " Mathiastck 18:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| This page has been
transwikied to
Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here ( logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
-- CopyToWiktionaryBot 02:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Is this site worth mentioning in relation to this page?
Sorry if it's not, this is my first time talking on here so be gentle...
- Ha! I used to love that web comic. Not sure if it is worth mentioning though, as I'm not deep enough into the Wikipedia editing front line to know. 2607:FCC8:9306:C400:7D7C:BBD7:4465:8663 ( talk) 17:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)