![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've seen always seen 1517 - genealogics says in February, which means possible confusion, but I've never seen 1518 except here. Can somebody provide a source for it being 1518 rather than 1517? john k ( talk) 01:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
The 3rd Duke of Alba cannot have been involved in the conquest of Navarre in 1512 as he was only 5. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.41.42.2 ( talk) 11:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Was she not by right as queen-regnant also Co-Princess of Andorra? -- Gryffindor ( talk) 22:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
The crown of Navarre passed to the eldest son, or to the eldest daughter if there were no legitimate sons. It never passed to a daughter if there was a legitimate son, not even if the daughter was older. That has nothing to do with Salic law. It's simply male-preferance primogeniture. Prefering elder daughters over younger sons ( absolute primogeniture) is something monarchies would start doing only 4 centuries later - 1981, to be precise. Surtsicna ( talk) 10:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've seen always seen 1517 - genealogics says in February, which means possible confusion, but I've never seen 1518 except here. Can somebody provide a source for it being 1518 rather than 1517? john k ( talk) 01:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
The 3rd Duke of Alba cannot have been involved in the conquest of Navarre in 1512 as he was only 5. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.41.42.2 ( talk) 11:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Was she not by right as queen-regnant also Co-Princess of Andorra? -- Gryffindor ( talk) 22:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
The crown of Navarre passed to the eldest son, or to the eldest daughter if there were no legitimate sons. It never passed to a daughter if there was a legitimate son, not even if the daughter was older. That has nothing to do with Salic law. It's simply male-preferance primogeniture. Prefering elder daughters over younger sons ( absolute primogeniture) is something monarchies would start doing only 4 centuries later - 1981, to be precise. Surtsicna ( talk) 10:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)