This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Within seconds of posting this article, quite well-researched, an editor deleted it as 'blatant advertising'. It is no such thing. Several other lead actors in the BBC TV series have Wikipedia entries. The tone is neutral enough. Even where I cited a claimed 'good ear for accents' I used the expression 'reputedly'. Of course, all Wikipedia entries are subject to editing and revision but to delete it out of hand is dramatic and excessive.
This modest and uncontroversial little article seems to be experiencing a difficult birth. Assuming good faith on the part of the previous editor I have included the references where the facts came from in the reference section and removed the infobox relating to ‘unverifiable sources’ (sic). The only other matter that seems to be contended is whether 10 episodes of a prime-time BBC series as one of the leads would qualify a person for notability. (An entry in IMDB doesn’t, of course.) I understand the objection and it’s a fine point but I think it just about does, particularly in view of the fact that such TV appearances are not the only ones this actress has made. I’ve read, though I haven’t included it in the article, that this actress is currently filming another major role for the BBC in the series ‘Miss Florence’. I didn’t include it as there was only sketchy information about it. I’ve left off the link to the agency which an unforgiving editor could consider linkspam (a new term for me) even though it wasn’t intended as such, as it seems to duplicate information available elsewhere.
Artdesigns2006 10:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Catherine Tyldesley. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Catherine Tyldesley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
This section is tabloid trivia. If it must be included, hopefully a sensible editor will prune this down to a proportionate amount of text in the "personal" section. It should not have its own section nor should it be a back-and-forth replay of the conversations. Schazjmd (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Within seconds of posting this article, quite well-researched, an editor deleted it as 'blatant advertising'. It is no such thing. Several other lead actors in the BBC TV series have Wikipedia entries. The tone is neutral enough. Even where I cited a claimed 'good ear for accents' I used the expression 'reputedly'. Of course, all Wikipedia entries are subject to editing and revision but to delete it out of hand is dramatic and excessive.
This modest and uncontroversial little article seems to be experiencing a difficult birth. Assuming good faith on the part of the previous editor I have included the references where the facts came from in the reference section and removed the infobox relating to ‘unverifiable sources’ (sic). The only other matter that seems to be contended is whether 10 episodes of a prime-time BBC series as one of the leads would qualify a person for notability. (An entry in IMDB doesn’t, of course.) I understand the objection and it’s a fine point but I think it just about does, particularly in view of the fact that such TV appearances are not the only ones this actress has made. I’ve read, though I haven’t included it in the article, that this actress is currently filming another major role for the BBC in the series ‘Miss Florence’. I didn’t include it as there was only sketchy information about it. I’ve left off the link to the agency which an unforgiving editor could consider linkspam (a new term for me) even though it wasn’t intended as such, as it seems to duplicate information available elsewhere.
Artdesigns2006 10:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Catherine Tyldesley. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Catherine Tyldesley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
This section is tabloid trivia. If it must be included, hopefully a sensible editor will prune this down to a proportionate amount of text in the "personal" section. It should not have its own section nor should it be a back-and-forth replay of the conversations. Schazjmd (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)