Chemical and Bio Engineering Unassessed ( inactive) | |||||||
|
The current text seems to originate from this and this. Could someone with insight (and no CoI) rewrite, or should we just get rid of it? It's pretty useless as it stands. Favonian ( talk) 17:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Asymmetric catalytic oxidation is, presumably, a specialized application of catalytic oxidation so how can the two be unrelated? Biscuittin ( talk) 19:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Catalytic oxidation is a large topic and so the undeveloped nature of this core article was a little surprising to me before I started revising today. The topic is so central that advice from others is welcome so that the editing proceeds with some consensus or at least the absence of dissent:
Other advice or comments is welcome.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 01:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Catalytic oxidation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Chemical and Bio Engineering Unassessed ( inactive) | |||||||
|
The current text seems to originate from this and this. Could someone with insight (and no CoI) rewrite, or should we just get rid of it? It's pretty useless as it stands. Favonian ( talk) 17:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Asymmetric catalytic oxidation is, presumably, a specialized application of catalytic oxidation so how can the two be unrelated? Biscuittin ( talk) 19:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Catalytic oxidation is a large topic and so the undeveloped nature of this core article was a little surprising to me before I started revising today. The topic is so central that advice from others is welcome so that the editing proceeds with some consensus or at least the absence of dissent:
Other advice or comments is welcome.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 01:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Catalytic oxidation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)