From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: Captain Galaxy ( talk · contribs) 01:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula ( talk · contribs) 18:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC) reply


Funny enough, I was just thinking of bringing this article to GA, as I myself am a mobile game enthusiast. TWOrantulaTM ( enter the web) 18:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Reference section exists; no bare URLs spotted.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Article is stable.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.

Quickfail?

  • Green tickY No cleanup banners or citation needed tags.
  • Green tickY First review; no previous mistakes to note.

Lead

  • Note: I will correct minor grammar mistakes myself as to not waste time.
  • The game encourages replayability by counting the player's deaths instead of giving the player lives. - To me, this sounds like OR, especially because the sources used to cite it do not directly mention how the gameplay encourages replayability.
 Done I believe this was probably added by me due to the wording of the 148Apps source: "After you've beaten the game, you can go back and try levels without dying, but for now, why not enjoy the journey?". With that being said, I've opted to remove any mention of the word replayability.
  • The game was downloaded over five million times. - If information can be found, when was this achieved?
As far as I'm aware, the Sensor Tower source is the only reliable source to mention the game's download stats. Additionally, the first time this source was archived was by me this year so I can't check the way back machine to check.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: Captain Galaxy ( talk · contribs) 01:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula ( talk · contribs) 18:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC) reply


Funny enough, I was just thinking of bringing this article to GA, as I myself am a mobile game enthusiast. TWOrantulaTM ( enter the web) 18:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Reference section exists; no bare URLs spotted.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Article is stable.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.

Quickfail?

  • Green tickY No cleanup banners or citation needed tags.
  • Green tickY First review; no previous mistakes to note.

Lead

  • Note: I will correct minor grammar mistakes myself as to not waste time.
  • The game encourages replayability by counting the player's deaths instead of giving the player lives. - To me, this sounds like OR, especially because the sources used to cite it do not directly mention how the gameplay encourages replayability.
 Done I believe this was probably added by me due to the wording of the 148Apps source: "After you've beaten the game, you can go back and try levels without dying, but for now, why not enjoy the journey?". With that being said, I've opted to remove any mention of the word replayability.
  • The game was downloaded over five million times. - If information can be found, when was this achieved?
As far as I'm aware, the Sensor Tower source is the only reliable source to mention the game's download stats. Additionally, the first time this source was archived was by me this year so I can't check the way back machine to check.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook