This article is written in
Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
If the humidex figure is an error, WHY ARE WE LISTING IT ON THE TABLE!? Let's find the highest non-error number, and put that in. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
184.68.61.66 (
talk)
16:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Who says what is more important than what is being said. Environment Canada is a reliable source, so it MUST be included in the table no matter how obvious it is that it's wrong. If a blog explains why the moon landing actually took place, it is considered unreliable by Wikipedia. If a reliable source says the landing was faked, that's considered more reliable. Basically, a reliable source is innocent until proven guilty while a blog is considered guilty until a reliable source exonerates it.
Tatlayoko (
talk)
20:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)reply
This article is written in
Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
If the humidex figure is an error, WHY ARE WE LISTING IT ON THE TABLE!? Let's find the highest non-error number, and put that in. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
184.68.61.66 (
talk)
16:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Who says what is more important than what is being said. Environment Canada is a reliable source, so it MUST be included in the table no matter how obvious it is that it's wrong. If a blog explains why the moon landing actually took place, it is considered unreliable by Wikipedia. If a reliable source says the landing was faked, that's considered more reliable. Basically, a reliable source is innocent until proven guilty while a blog is considered guilty until a reliable source exonerates it.
Tatlayoko (
talk)
20:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)reply