This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Castle Hill, Huddersfield article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first draft of the article, as added to Wikipedia this morning, stated that it was based on a work published in the 1990s. That would make it a copyvio unless the writer of the article and the writer of the book were one and the same. It finally turned out, according to the author — see their Talk page — that the initial basis of fact was indeed that printed work, but the writing is original to Gaj. Therefore, no copyvio. Bill 15:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
It is not a question that facts should not be deleted. I presume the developers are "Asian" but it has never been sourced. Also is it important that they are "Asian"? I would have thought that the fact that they are local developers is the important point. Please stop reverting and discuss the issue here. -- Bduke 07:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
The fact the the Town Council had to take legal action against them for their activities is sourced here:- [: http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=17080743%26siteid=50060-name_page.html]
The activities leading up to the action is sourced here:- [: http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=15170728%26siteid=50060-name_page.html]
Their friendly nature is evidenced here:- [: http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=16153975%26siteid=50060-name_page.html]
Their unfriendly nature is sourced here:- [: http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=16153976%26siteid=50060-name_page.html] 82.30.76.239 08:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
I have no doubt that this is an important issue, but why is it important to state that they are "Asian". In one sense they are as Yorkshire as I am, even though I live in Australia, or presumably you are. It is what they did that is important not that they look Asian. The edit war is that "Asian" keeps getting added and then deleted. There really is not need for it. I'm sure most people recognise Thandi as an Asian name. Let it go. Concentrate on the issue. -- Bduke 10:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
There is no reason to use the word Asian here to denote the brothers, unless it is to say that part of the route of the problem in the community was resistence to perceived outsiders?? This comment was by User:80.192.148.26.
I agree, and that argument is not made. I have therefore removed the word "Asian". I hope you will both accept my mediation in this matter. -- Bduke 00:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Castle Hill, Huddersfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:14, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Castle Hill, Huddersfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Castle Hill, Huddersfield article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first draft of the article, as added to Wikipedia this morning, stated that it was based on a work published in the 1990s. That would make it a copyvio unless the writer of the article and the writer of the book were one and the same. It finally turned out, according to the author — see their Talk page — that the initial basis of fact was indeed that printed work, but the writing is original to Gaj. Therefore, no copyvio. Bill 15:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
It is not a question that facts should not be deleted. I presume the developers are "Asian" but it has never been sourced. Also is it important that they are "Asian"? I would have thought that the fact that they are local developers is the important point. Please stop reverting and discuss the issue here. -- Bduke 07:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
The fact the the Town Council had to take legal action against them for their activities is sourced here:- [: http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=17080743%26siteid=50060-name_page.html]
The activities leading up to the action is sourced here:- [: http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=15170728%26siteid=50060-name_page.html]
Their friendly nature is evidenced here:- [: http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=16153975%26siteid=50060-name_page.html]
Their unfriendly nature is sourced here:- [: http://ichuddersfield.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=16153976%26siteid=50060-name_page.html] 82.30.76.239 08:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
I have no doubt that this is an important issue, but why is it important to state that they are "Asian". In one sense they are as Yorkshire as I am, even though I live in Australia, or presumably you are. It is what they did that is important not that they look Asian. The edit war is that "Asian" keeps getting added and then deleted. There really is not need for it. I'm sure most people recognise Thandi as an Asian name. Let it go. Concentrate on the issue. -- Bduke 10:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
There is no reason to use the word Asian here to denote the brothers, unless it is to say that part of the route of the problem in the community was resistence to perceived outsiders?? This comment was by User:80.192.148.26.
I agree, and that argument is not made. I have therefore removed the word "Asian". I hope you will both accept my mediation in this matter. -- Bduke 00:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Castle Hill, Huddersfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:14, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Castle Hill, Huddersfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)