This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Castillonnais article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Castillonnais has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
July 23, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that although the
Castillonnais
horse breed has its roots in antiquity, it wasn't officially recognized until 1996? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Castillonnais (cheval) from fr.wikipedia. |
Hello, and thanks for the translation ! The french article is not among our best articles on french wp, it need a good review too, but there's very few informations about this breed, who exist juste in a few area. So, very few informations (and nothing in english !) -- Tsaag Valren ( talk) 16:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 10:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC) At first glance, the article appears to be largely in-line with the GA criteria. I will be looking at it in more detail shortly. I propose making minor copyedits and bringing any more major matters to this review. I was initially amused to see that the horses are used for logging and packing food, leaving me with a mental image of a horse working in a food processing factory!
Here are a few comments on the prose: Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 20:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | The prose is acceptable | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Complies with the MOS. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | The references seem sufficient | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | No problem here | |
2c. it contains no original research. | No | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | It covers the main aspects adequately. The Castillonnais is a little known breed and the available information is also limited. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Article has been expanded from a stud since the beginning of July and is stable. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Images are appropriately licensed. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | There are 2 images and both are relevant. | |
7. Overall assessment. | Although short, I consider that this article passes all the criteria for Good Article status. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Castillonnais. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ariegenews.com/news/news-1-9-3518.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Castillonnais article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Castillonnais has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
July 23, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that although the
Castillonnais
horse breed has its roots in antiquity, it wasn't officially recognized until 1996? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Castillonnais (cheval) from fr.wikipedia. |
Hello, and thanks for the translation ! The french article is not among our best articles on french wp, it need a good review too, but there's very few informations about this breed, who exist juste in a few area. So, very few informations (and nothing in english !) -- Tsaag Valren ( talk) 16:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 10:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC) At first glance, the article appears to be largely in-line with the GA criteria. I will be looking at it in more detail shortly. I propose making minor copyedits and bringing any more major matters to this review. I was initially amused to see that the horses are used for logging and packing food, leaving me with a mental image of a horse working in a food processing factory!
Here are a few comments on the prose: Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 20:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | The prose is acceptable | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Complies with the MOS. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | The references seem sufficient | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | No problem here | |
2c. it contains no original research. | No | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | It covers the main aspects adequately. The Castillonnais is a little known breed and the available information is also limited. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Article has been expanded from a stud since the beginning of July and is stable. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Images are appropriately licensed. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | There are 2 images and both are relevant. | |
7. Overall assessment. | Although short, I consider that this article passes all the criteria for Good Article status. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Castillonnais. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ariegenews.com/news/news-1-9-3518.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)