This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Castilian War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The source accompanying note 9 is a letter from 1620 talking about the events of that year, forty-two years after the war in question ended. Tulesounds ( talk) 23:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi. So, I've read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons - Wikipedia, so far, the only issue was the over-use, because the use of flag icons in the infoboxes of military conflicts were said to have been exempted from the "avoid flag icons in infoboxes" rule. would it be okay for you if the flags were to be added back with a different format? or would you like to clarify what exactly was wrong? thank you. Delirium333 ( talk) 14:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi I am referring to MOS:INFOBOXFLAG. In it, it says "Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they could be unnecessarily distracting and might give undue prominence to one field among many." Danial Bass ( talk) 14:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Okay, somebody deleted the two units used in the War. For the 62 cannons, it has a reference ALREADY. the 50 Ships and Galley can be found in the Military of the Bruneian Sultanate (1368 - 1888) at the Decline section. So if you want to delete it again. check their respective articles. (62 Cannons can also be mentioned in Battle of Kota Batu (1578)). Syazwi Irfan ( talk) 05:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Castilian War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The source accompanying note 9 is a letter from 1620 talking about the events of that year, forty-two years after the war in question ended. Tulesounds ( talk) 23:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi. So, I've read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons - Wikipedia, so far, the only issue was the over-use, because the use of flag icons in the infoboxes of military conflicts were said to have been exempted from the "avoid flag icons in infoboxes" rule. would it be okay for you if the flags were to be added back with a different format? or would you like to clarify what exactly was wrong? thank you. Delirium333 ( talk) 14:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi I am referring to MOS:INFOBOXFLAG. In it, it says "Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they could be unnecessarily distracting and might give undue prominence to one field among many." Danial Bass ( talk) 14:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Okay, somebody deleted the two units used in the War. For the 62 cannons, it has a reference ALREADY. the 50 Ships and Galley can be found in the Military of the Bruneian Sultanate (1368 - 1888) at the Decline section. So if you want to delete it again. check their respective articles. (62 Cannons can also be mentioned in Battle of Kota Batu (1578)). Syazwi Irfan ( talk) 05:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)