This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Caryl Churchill article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please try to discuss the controversies surrounding Churchill's works on this page. It is certainly possible to document them without resorting to citing blogs. I have protected the page. Once there is consensus on this page about changes, any admin can un-protect the article. -- ☑ SamuelWantman 06:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
This is probably necessary. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mandrake/4612540/Caryl-Churchill-is-acccused-of-anti-Semitism.html This link as well as reviews of the play by The Times, The Guardian etc. should be used. Teatreez ( talk) 16:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
So some of the usual suspects used the standard catch-all to attack the play, as indeed they always will. Was that it, or was there any justification for this taunt of racism? If there was reasoned justification then a synopsis should appear here. And if not why are the comments mentioned in this way at all? Kombo the mzungu ( talk) 21:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
According to our policy "Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users" and "Persistent vandalism, or the possibility of such for high-trafficked articles does not usually provide a basis for full-protection". On this article, we have seen several incidents of BLP-violating vandalism in a single day by just one editor, all swiftly reverted. This does not seem sufficient to me to justify even temporary semi protection, let alone indefinite full protection. So I request that it be unblocked, to enable constructive editors to continue to improve it. RolandR ( talk) 12:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Caryl Churchill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Caryl Churchill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
I have made some edits to improve this article including one deletion of content as the only reference I could find was a direct copy and it was on a Prezi link that did not cite the author. I believe more work is needed before before the banners identifying problems can be removed.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pakoire ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Pakoire ( talk) 04:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC) (sorry for not signing)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Caryl Churchill article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please try to discuss the controversies surrounding Churchill's works on this page. It is certainly possible to document them without resorting to citing blogs. I have protected the page. Once there is consensus on this page about changes, any admin can un-protect the article. -- ☑ SamuelWantman 06:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
This is probably necessary. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mandrake/4612540/Caryl-Churchill-is-acccused-of-anti-Semitism.html This link as well as reviews of the play by The Times, The Guardian etc. should be used. Teatreez ( talk) 16:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
So some of the usual suspects used the standard catch-all to attack the play, as indeed they always will. Was that it, or was there any justification for this taunt of racism? If there was reasoned justification then a synopsis should appear here. And if not why are the comments mentioned in this way at all? Kombo the mzungu ( talk) 21:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
According to our policy "Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users" and "Persistent vandalism, or the possibility of such for high-trafficked articles does not usually provide a basis for full-protection". On this article, we have seen several incidents of BLP-violating vandalism in a single day by just one editor, all swiftly reverted. This does not seem sufficient to me to justify even temporary semi protection, let alone indefinite full protection. So I request that it be unblocked, to enable constructive editors to continue to improve it. RolandR ( talk) 12:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Caryl Churchill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Caryl Churchill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
I have made some edits to improve this article including one deletion of content as the only reference I could find was a direct copy and it was on a Prezi link that did not cite the author. I believe more work is needed before before the banners identifying problems can be removed.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pakoire ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Pakoire ( talk) 04:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC) (sorry for not signing)