GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Tim riley ( talk · contribs) 13:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Starting first read-through. More in a day or so.
Tim riley
talk
13:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Nothing much here to delay us. A few minor points you may like to consider, but nothing to stand in the way of promotion:
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
That's all from me. Nothing to frighten the horses. I've made a few minor corrections to what I take to be typos, but please check them to see you're happy. Over to you, before we formally cut the ribbon. Tim riley talk 13:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Thankyou Tim!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
When I last looked at this article, only a couple of weeks ago, it seemed to me to be there or thereabouts for GA, but since then it has been splendidly transformed. No fewer than three editors have worked on it to get it to it undoubted GA standard, and IMO, a good deal higher: it seems to me to be knocking at the door of FAC. Be that as it may, for present purposes it plainly meets all the GA criteria. I don't feel it necessary to wait till the very minor tweaks agreed above are all in place, so:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
On to FAC, I hope, though I see you have an anniversary DKY to achieve first. Please keep me posted. Glad to lend any hand that may be wanted. Tim riley talk 14:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Tim riley ( talk · contribs) 13:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Starting first read-through. More in a day or so.
Tim riley
talk
13:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Nothing much here to delay us. A few minor points you may like to consider, but nothing to stand in the way of promotion:
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
Done
That's all from me. Nothing to frighten the horses. I've made a few minor corrections to what I take to be typos, but please check them to see you're happy. Over to you, before we formally cut the ribbon. Tim riley talk 13:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Thankyou Tim!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
When I last looked at this article, only a couple of weeks ago, it seemed to me to be there or thereabouts for GA, but since then it has been splendidly transformed. No fewer than three editors have worked on it to get it to it undoubted GA standard, and IMO, a good deal higher: it seems to me to be knocking at the door of FAC. Be that as it may, for present purposes it plainly meets all the GA criteria. I don't feel it necessary to wait till the very minor tweaks agreed above are all in place, so:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
On to FAC, I hope, though I see you have an anniversary DKY to achieve first. Please keep me posted. Glad to lend any hand that may be wanted. Tim riley talk 14:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)