![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Please see Talk:Mannerheim. Scoo 14:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
The article now states that Mannerheim's height was 194 cm (6'4"). While many sources give this number -- Mannerheim certainly was tall -- I've seen many reliable sources stating his height was 'only' 187 cm (6'2"). - Mikko H. 10:13, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
As a military commander Mannerheim was a mixed success.
Cinik 16:29, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
the edit of 21:09, 10 July 2006 68.166.138.247 claims there is a "new recording" found between Hitler and Mannerheim. Is this really a _new_ recording, or just the old one that mannerheim's adjutants conducted secretly during a train-ride where mannerheim and hitler discussed during Hitler's visit. That tape has been around for quite some time and is said to be pretty much the only tape of hitler speaking in his non-official way (which was quite different from the way he spoke in official speeches etc.), in fact the actor that played Hitler in the movie "der untergang" used that tape for training Hitler's way of speaking in private.
But that would not be a "new" tape as the edit claims. so sources would be great.
Gillis 21:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree it deserves it's own article, but what should we call an article about the recording, it can't really be "secret recording of hitler during his visit to Finland as long named articles probably don't get the attention they deserve. Could it be called "The immola recording" (place) or "The damen recording"(man who made it) or maybe "Hitler's recording in Finland" or? get your suggestions out! Gillis 07:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
I have a problem with this sentence: "After the Russian Revolution of 1917 he successfully led the army of the newly independent Finnish nation through a troubled period between 1918 and 1945." Mannerheim wasn't really a military leader between the wars. See the article itself under heading "Between the wars" and also [1] -- between the wars Mannerheim's interests were mixed, often more charitable than political, and he even worked as a banker. So I feel the above sentence is not accurate and therefore I changed it to "He started his military career in the Imperial Russian army, becoming the leader of Finnish government forces in the civil war of 1918 and during the Second World War." Wempain 20:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Calling Paasikivi a "Russophile" is inaccurate. Paasikivi, who was a member of the Conservative Party, represented what came later to be called "Realpolitik"; his goal was to ensure through a policy of appeasement that Finland retained its independence and as much political free rein as possible. A pragmatic politician if there ever was one, he understood that security could only be guaranteed through friendly relations with the Soviet Union, but this does not render him a "Russophile" - only an astute diplomat.-- Death Bredon 14:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
User:Wempain seems to think he should always be referred to by his full name, Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim. In my experience, he is most commonly known as Carl Gustaf Mannerheim, and Britannica confirms this with the title of their article on him. But I suppose there may be a good argument for moving it still, I don't know. Everyking 18:08, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Carl Gustav Mannerheim ( 1797– 1854), grandfather of the marshall, was an entomologist and governor in Viborgs län. The second middle name is relevant a "natural disambiguator". Beside that, I would like to agree with both of you. :-) To refer to Mannerheim with the ugly acronym C. G. E. Mannerheim or the full name is no good usage, but the article is better moved back to the name that's considered his full and correct by (at least) Swedish speakers, which he was himself. -- Johan Magnus 07:35, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
All right, I moved it back to Wempain's title. Everyking 14:44, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
My grandfather received a commendation from Mannerheim for his participation in the Civil War (or the War of Independence, as it was called at the time). In the spirit of the times, the document is signed (albeit with a stamp) "Kustaa Mannerheim". Kustaa is the Finnish version of the name Gustav/Gustaf and is also used, e.g., of all Swedish kings of that name, including the present one, Kaarle XVI Kustaa (Carl XVI Gustaf). Mannerheim does not appear to have continued this practice very long after 1918. Incidentally, the official candidate of the Finnish royalists for the Finnish throne was not Mannerheim but Prince Friedrich Karl of Hesse, who was actually accepted by parliament and proposed to rule under the name "Väinö I", but this plan fell through when Germany lost WW1. -- Death Bredon 14:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
This article could probably benefit from going into slightly more depth on the relationship between Aksel Airo and the Field Marshal. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 00:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
According to a quite recent study mannerheims family did not come from the netherlands, but from Germany. The finnish wikipedia has already changed this. And it seems someone has tried changing it here but become reverted. The link to the source (in finnish) [2] mtv3 also ran the same new [3]. Could someone find an English source for this? also this of course is just one stdy, but looks like pretty solid evidence though.
Just looks a bit stupid when en.wikipedia says dutch and fi.wikipedia says german.
Gillis 22:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to add some sort of comparison that helps people realise that Mannerheim enjoys a status as a national hero par excellence and father of the nation. Would a comparison with George Washington or Kemal Atatürk be appropriate? These were also war heroes that also skillfully led the difficult birth of a nation and the troubled times that followed and they enjoy a similar "father of the nation" status. -Sensemaker
Shouldn't there be section about movies and shows where he has been character acted by some actor. I'm quite frankly asking this because there is going to be movie of him that will be published around the world. It is called simply Mannerheim. Its just odd that he has been used as character in many movies and in books and there is not a single mention about it. Shouldn't a section about this be added as many other historical people including Hitler has somekind of section dealing with movies, series or books where he has been a character. -- 80.221.239.213 ( talk) 10:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, all. I've looked over this article per the request here. There are still a few issues with the article that I noticed. The main one, which is preventing it from being rated as B-class, is the serious lack of citations throughout the article. There is also the inconsistent style of citations; most of them use the <ref> </ref> format, but there are a few (which I have highlighted in the text with editors' comments) that are parenthetical references. These need to be converted into the former style. Another, more minor issue, is that there is some overlink. General dates shouldn't usually be linked, nor should thinks like car, for instance. I hope these suggestions help the writers of this article improve it, so it can eventually reach FA. Keep up the good work! Parsecboy ( talk) 23:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm no expert on uniforms or anything but the uniform he's wearing in the main photo looks remarkably similar to the German WW2 uniform and he also seems to be wearing German Iron Crosses on his uniform; does anybody know why this is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.242.41 ( talk) 20:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Although surprisingly little is known about his private life, should we include something about present claims suggesting that Mannerheim was a homo-/bisexual? The article mentions his unsuccessful marriage and kind of establishes him as a heterosexual because of that. Apart of the quite recent short film controversial in Finland that portrays him as a homosexual, there is much contemporary debate about his sexuality. Maybe the legacy section should somehow address these claims? With reliable sources of course. JJohannes ( talk) 00:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
From the history I see that there has been some altering back and forth between two versions. The one currently in use is full of derogatory remarks on Hitler without citations. Doesn't correspond to NPOV, and some of it hardly fit into a high class article at all. Instead of just altering it back to the previous smaller version, I prefer to bring it up here. There was a lot of politics about that meeting and Mannerheim was aware of the possible future implications from being to cordial with Hitler, as he was during WWI when Finland approached Germany. Norrefeldt 11:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hitler with Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel (the Chief of the Armed Forces High Command) and the Reich Press Chief Dietrich flew to Finland for meetings with the Finnish president Ryti and Mannerheim in June 1942, see video [4] Notice how Mannerheim greeted Hitler by saluting him several times.
Later Mannerheim paid a visit to Hitler's Headquarters in Germany. There Mannerheim had meeetings with Adolf Hitler, Chief of Staff Halder, Grand Admiral Rader, and Reichsfuhrer-SS Himmler and their staff. Then Mannerheim went to the Headquarters of the Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering, see video [5]
On both videos Mannerheim and his Finnish generals can be seen talking with Hitler and German generals, and also studying military maps together. Discussions were top secret, so a Finnish reporter taped only 20 minutes of conversation, then the taperecorder was stopped by a German security officer. Out of two days and many hours of Hitler - Mannerheim meetings, we have a few minutes of "edited" videos and 20 minutes of "interrupted" radio recording. But there were several more hours of high level discussions, there was much more talking that was not recorded! 130.166.34.165 ( talk) 05:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
What was your point in this post? Everybody knew that they talked about military tactics in both occasions and it seemed that Hitler was the one who talked about it more than Mannerheim. Also of course people talk to eachother it wouldn't be polite not to talk to the guests if they are visiting. Also what is so odd in the saluting that it needs to be mentioned. Of course Mannerheim had to salute Hitler if he made any gesture that could have been considered as greeting as if he would have not saluted it would have been taken as an insult. Mannerheim wasn't stupid as he was quite experienced diplomat. Also Mannerheim has to salute every one of the guest as its the military tradition to greet. Also your film material is only those recorded by Germans there is other films of Hitler's visit in Finland made by YLE (the company that also recorded the secret recording) and are open to anyone to see. So you claiming that there is just few minutes of film is not true. Heres part of a document done of Mannerheim and there you can clearly seperate the German film from the Finnish one as the Finnish one is more clearer than the German one. [6] Also you can see on the Finnish film when the German and Finnish reporters and cameraman move to shoot Mannerheim and Hitler getting in the train and Mannerheim politely letting Hitler go first. Also seen on the German material. Also your information that a German officer stopped the recording is wrong. The man who stopped the recording was the Finnish communication officer when he noticed that the recorder guys were still recording. If a German officer would have noticed that they even recorded that 20 minutes they would have confiscated and destroyed the recording as Hitler didn't want any recording to be in existence where he talked with his normal voice. Also once again the conversation with them was not really any way a secret and every historian of Finnish war history knows that. Even in the document it was stated that Mannerheim and Ryti was expecting Hitler to come with somekind of demands about the war so the negotiations were not really any secret. -- 80.221.235.130 ( talk) 18:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
130.166.34.165 ( talk) 00:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Well... i like this article... but this little thing troubles me, it really is not a big deal but...
"Ironically, Mannerheim never learned to speak Finnish until he was in his fifties."
well, yes it could be seen as ironical to many, but in fact very few of the ruling class spoke finnish as their mother tongue, or even fluently at that time, most spoke swedish(as there is two official languages in finland, and at that time swedish was more common for the ruling class). In fact also russian was more common in mannerheims youth for someone like mannerheim. So in a sence this is really not as ironical/funny as it might be to someone who does not know about that fact. But i can't come up with a smooth way of incorporating that information into it...
any ideas or thoughts?
Gillis 19:11, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Gillis 16:58, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
i removed the picture at the wery top of the page. i do wonder who changed the older picture to that horrific new one.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.210.208 ( talk) 20:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't the legacy section also include a bit more info on Mannerheim League for Child Wellfare? -- TheHande ( talk) 14:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Arguably Mannerheim is chiefly known as a distinguished commander with a military career spanning four decades and five wars
Yet the article says very little about his military exploits and achievements during these wars. It is truely remarkable that the article fails to mention even the Mannerheim Line! In the first two wars, Mannerheim was a minor commander, and thus this article is the main place where his achievements (which elevated him to the status of Finland's most senior military figure and laid the foundation for his future leadership roles) can be summarised, if only briefly. In the last three wars, Mannerheim was the leading figure, and, naturally, the details of the operations under his command are discussed in the respective artciles about these wars. But a summary in the Mannerheim article is in order, like it is done in the Russian language article. BorisG ( talk) 17:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Considering Finland's 20th Century history (e.g., civil war in 1917-1918, the Terijoki gov't in this time period) and the presumptive unfamiliarity of many readers of this article with the history, the way it was expressed prior to the change by the user identified by only his/her IP address appears preferable. If the esteemed contributor feels strongly about the change, when changing it back to "Finnish Defense Forces," would you please put the definite article in front of FDF so it's clear there weren't other FD forces. Thanks. (The definite article in front would be standard English usage, and might accomplish the same thing as the way it was done before.) Paavo273 ( talk) 16:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Firstly, thanks to anonymous user using IP #95.150.233.48 for the great edits, especially ridding the article of dead Wikilinks. Rel spelling changes I've reverted, I can't find any authority for Britified spelling in this article under Wikipedia:Manual of style#National varieties of English. To my knowledge and IMO, USA had the much stronger connection to the Marshal, just, e.g., sold him some aeroplanes his pilots used w/ great skill, sold him other war materiel, sent some significant if totally inadequate humanitarian aid, etc. Paavo273 ( talk) 01:17, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
1. 'Don't think there's any real disagreement here about what happened. It's just a logical contradiction that you can fight and demobilize at the same time.
2. If the way I've fixed it now is not satisfactory to you, then I ask as per WP:Verifiability#Citing non-English sources, that you or s.o. quote from the original apparently Finnish source what it actually says, and I will add a tag to that effect.
3. That source citation is also defective (as used for the first time earlier under the Brief Presidency heading), lacks page number and also lacks sufficient publication info to be able to find it. Of course, even an incomplete source is better than no source, which this article suffers from. (Recently read an interesting biography of M and hope to add cites from it to support a lot of the uncited info in the article.)
4. Rel pronouns vs. antecedents, it's standard procedure to rename the antecedent, in this case the subject of the article, at the beginning of a new paragraph. This is not a controversial convention, and is done widely including in this article. As it is, this paragraph barely mentions M as it is. Paavo273 ( talk) 17:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
2. It is not accurate currently(so it is not acceptable) as the units deployed against the Germans were not exempted from it. Also, your own 'corrections' lacked citations just as well - use of 'logic' like you did in such a case is actually violation of WP:NOR clause if you do not have sources to support your edit(s). Here is one source which supports what i stated (Google books link) which makes it abundantly clear that Finnish demobilization was concluded prior to the termination of hostilities.
- Wanderer602 ( talk) 22:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi all. I'm proposing to delete the following statement:
"It has been suggested that one reason why the Soviet offensive in Karelian Isthmus in June 1944 took the Finns by surprise was that Mannerheim was unable to see the forest for the trees. There was no other authority save Mannerheim to collect the intelligence and turn it into operational orders.[citation needed]"
This would be extremely weaselly even were it sourced (e.g., "It has been suggested..."), and nobody has bothered to add a citation to it since it was tagged in August 2009. Now is the time to place the cite or argue for further keeping. Absent a proper cite or persuasive argument to keep, I will plan to delete it soon. Paavo273 ( talk) 19:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
User:Ttalho added the following, which I removed:
As the head of the White ( right-wing) troops, Mannerheim was highly distrusted among the Reds ( left-wing supporters) during the war and after it. He earned himself the nickname "Lahtari" ("The Executioner"), a reference to the mass executions of Reds committed by the White troops at the end of the civil war.
I think this is both an inappropriate political interpretation as well as technically incorrect. "Lahtari" was a derogatory term used by the Reds (communists) of all Whites (non-communists), not just General Mannerheim. The term was used during the war as well, so its roots were not in the post-war executions. Also, it's natural for a party in a civil war to distrust the leader of the other party. This distrust of the Reds didn't disappear with the end of the brief civil war, but remarkably at the time of the Russian aggression of 1939 (The Winter War) the former Reds joined the Whites to fight the invaders, all under the command of General Mannerheim.
For more information about the distrust between the former Reds and Whites, see Civil War in Finland#Outcome and Lapua Movement. I think the political atmosphere in Finland in the 1920s and 1930s is an interesting subject and the label "lahtari" has to do with this topic, but this discussion shouldn't be in this biographical article.
- Wempain 01:28, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim was born on 4-th of june but in Europe it was 16-th of june because in Russian Empire (Finland was its part at that moment) it was Julian calendar used up to year 1918. So his date of deth in this artcle is given in Gregorian calendar, but his date of birth is given in Julian calendar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Шивва Рудра ( talk • contribs) 12:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
The first name which was used by Mannerheim was Gustaf, as can be seen at the homepage of the Mannerheim Museum [9] and at Kansallisbiografia page with biographies over famous Finns [10]. I don't think any of his friends said "Carl Gustaf Emil" to him. As long as all the names are not needed for disambiguation purposes, they are not needed in the article heading. See the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Proper names#Personal names: "However, if the person is conventionally known by only their first and last names and disambiguation is not required, any middle names should be omitted from the article title." Snowsuit Wearer ( talk| contribs) 21:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus, leaning not moved. No consensus that the proposed title is the common name. Jenks24 ( talk) 08:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim →
Gustaf Mannerheim – Having the full name (with all his three first names) in the article heading goes against the Manual of Style. Mannerheim's most used first name was only Gustaf. Also see discussion above.
Snowsuit Wearer (
talk|
contribs) 09:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC) --Relisted.
Georgie says "Happy Halloween!" (
BOO!)
05:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
I was going to add "Overly detailed" tag to the article, due to the amount on the intricate detail, but thought I'd post here first. Any feedback? K.e.coffman ( talk) 18:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
First it ought to be noted that Finland was nothing but an integral part of Sweden until 1809.
Second, i removed a section and a source claimed that CGE Mannerheim would have "became a strong proponent for the adoption of Finnish as a national language, to the dismay of the minority Finn-Swedes who wanted only Swedish as a single official language". The used source doesn't (i) handle the person being discussed in this wikipage, but instead a member of that family in 1840s, (ii) nor does it actually say what the editor claimed it would have. There is not a single word that would indicate that there would have been 'dismay' of any sorts or even to the issue of Finn-Swedes. - Wanderer602 ( talk) 18:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ra.yle.fi/ramgen/radioarkisto/poliitikot/c_g_e_mannerheim.rmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:54, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The article states that Mannerheim was given the rank of field marshal which it describes as honorary. That is incorrect, while the rank understandably carries prestige with it, it is a real rank commensurate with the larger forces commanded than those typically assigned to a full general. In American parlance, the 5 Star "general of the armies" is our equivalent of a field marshal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.182.83.219 ( talk) 02:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
This may seem silly, but I'd prefer a picture of Mannerheim's equestrian statue where he doesn't have a seagull on his head.
The pronunciation "kɑːɭ ²ɡɵstav ˈeːmɪl ²manːɛrˌheɪm" is outlandish, extremely bizarre, something you never hear in Finland, with the grave accents and the "ɭ" and some vowel qualities. It is based on the phonology of the Swedish language in Sweden. Could someone please provide a reliable IPA pronunciation for the name in Finland Swedish. The same pronunciation is used, with very slight modifications, in Finnish, too. -- Surfo ( talk) 08:50, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Could someone enlighten me on as to when did he get that baron's title? Marshal, sure, we Finns tend to use this title when referring to him but baron? To my understanding this might be a simple mistake as I sincerely don't remember coming across a reference to him being a baron during my 19 years of life, even when when my country has been talked about in history classes. No joke, I really don't remember him being given that title. Iikka Backman ( talk) 11:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Iikka Backman
His daughter Sophie Mannerheim Jr. (1895–1963) is listed with a hyperlink, which just clicks back to this article. Valetude ( talk) 22:48, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Someone please check out the photo of Hitler and Mannerheim, it has been crudely photoshopped with Trump's face over Hitler's, as can easily be seen when checking out the history of that file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.55.140.150 ( talk) 10:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
In the intro: "Twenty years later, when Finland was twice at war with the Soviet Union from November 1939 until September 1944, Mannerheim successfully led the defence of Finland as commander-in-chief of the country's armed forces."
While Finland definitely performed well above its weight class and Mannerheim deserves significant credit for that, I feel the word "successfully" is incorrect due to the fact that Finland technically lost both wars and ceded territory each time. Admitted counter argument: Helsinki never fell and Finland was spared the embarrassments felt by most other nations who lost to the Soviets -- 52.60.131.138 ( talk) 17:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Reluctant to edit this myself because I'm not familiar enough with Mannerheim but the English throughout this entire article is pretty poor. The Childhood and Education sections particularly read as if they have been put through Google translate. Is anyone able to do anything about this? Again don't want to do it myself because I'm no expert on him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francis vb ( talk • contribs) 14:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
User:Francis vb commented above about "bad English" without specifics. Here are two details needing fixes:
And the abbreviation "Meri (1990)" is repeatedly given in notes, but no expanded reference is available in the bibliography. Does anyone have that source? Maybe it was included in early version of this article, which appears to be translated from Finnish or some other language, or in the Finnish wikipedia version of it. -- Doncram ( talk) 19:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
P.S. The "lovable love of hearts" and more which does not make sense apparently was copied verbatim from the Google translated-to-English version of Finnish language source here. Need a Finnish native speaker to reconsider that source. -- Doncram ( talk) 19:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
He was not 6'4". His actual height was around 6'2". ( Westerhaley ( talk) 16:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC))
The article says:
As far I understand, "Dalai Lama" is a title, not a name. Shouldn't that be "who had met with the Dalai Lama"? JIP | Talk 20:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
"Twenty years later, when Finland was twice at war with the Soviet Union in the period from November 1939 until September 1944, Mannerheim led the defence of Finland as commander-in-chief of the country's armed forces." Unlike in the Winter War, the Soviets are not the aggressors of the Continuation War so he was not leading the "defence of Finland". Mannerheim and the Finnish army planned joint operations with their Nazi counterparts as part of Operation Barbarossa. According to the German military attache to Finland in WW2, Mannerheim had personally ordered preperations for a joint attack with Germany as early in September 1940. Regardless of whether or not you think about Mannerheim or Finland's role in WW2, it is clear that this should be changed. 23:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Originalcola ( talk • contribs)
The reasons for the Continuation War are manyfold and the question of "agressorship" is not straightforward. The Soviets shot down a Finnish civilian passenger aircraft (the Ju 82 "Kaleva") over the Gulf of Finland with nine persons on board on June 14th, 1940 during the "interim peace" between the Winter War and the Continuation War in an apparent attempt to acquire French and American diplomatic mail being carried by couriers. Foreign minister Vyatcheslav Molotov travelled to Berlin in November 1940 to ask Hitler to allow the Soviet Union to occupy Finland but received a negative answer. Finnish military personnel were acquainted with "Operation Barbarossa" on a visit to Berlin in late May 1941 but did not commit to taking part (as per their orders from the government). There is no evidence that Mannerheim would have "personally ordered preparations for a joint attack with Germany in September 1940"; this would have made no sense since Germany and the USSR were allies at that point, as stipulated by the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939. In discussions with the Germans in early June 1941, the Finns made it clear that they would only join in a German attack if they were attacked first by the Soviets. The actual military conflict began with the Soviet artillery and Air Force bombarding several military and non-military targets in Finland beginning June 22nd. Finland did not retaliate at first and tried to convince the Soviets of their neutrality. After the Soviet Air Force bombed Helsinki and several other cities (i.e., civilian targets) on June 25th, the Finnish government was forced to admit that it was at war and military operations commenced the next day. Whether the fact that the Finnish troops were able to advance quickly, take back the areas that had been ceded to the USSR after the Winter War and continue further into Eastern Karelia makes Finland the "agressor" is debatable -- one could compare the situation to the 6-day war of 1967 when Israel made a pre-emptive strike when it was fully expecting to be attacked itself -- but according to Marshal Mannerheim's answer to Churchill, the main reason for the advance further than the old border was to shorten the front line and secure a buffer against the Soviet counter attack that was sure to come. Mannerheim's motive was thus the defence of Finland from a renewed Russian attack, which all signs before the Continuation War suggested was being prepared; he just got there "firstest with the mostest men" as a Confederate general is supposed to have said.-- Jarmo K. ( talk) 16:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
can you all please stop editing out any mention of controversy? wikipedia isn't supposed to be a great man memorial but actually offer accurate information on people and that would include the many controversies.
Mx-Spoon (
talk)
01:30, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. to the title proposed, but there may be support for alternatives in a future RM.( closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 15:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim → Gustaf Mannerheim – as per Wikipedia:Article titles#Common names his name should just be Gustaf Mannerheim, not have all of his three given names. He is also called just Gustaf Mannerheim at Wikipedia of his home language, Swedish. 95.199.4.149 ( talk) 22:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
1. Firstly, 'fixed some imprecise language.
2. Secondly, LEGACY means what was left behind by someone, in the context used here close in meaning to the person's REPUTATION, what s/he is KNOWN FOR. Obscure content that no published Mannerheim scholar says M is known for, does NOT belong under legacy. If someone wants to create a heading in this article called "Blog of Random Gossip, Obscure Media Projects Including Those that Never Got Made, and Rumors about His Love Life" then the stuff I deleted might have a home.
Sadly, RANDOM GOSSIP is what much of Wikipedia has become.
It doesn't serve this article and especially not its LEGACY section, e.g., to talk about (A) a movie that never was made, (B) a plaque in a foreign, hostile country that was REMOVED, or (C) unsubstantiated rumours about Mannerheim's flings with women, with boys, or whomever or whatever, or about which or what gender(s) he preferred sexually. ESPECIALLY if no published Mannerheim scholars agree that this is what he is known for. Absent the REMOVAL or NON-HAPPENING itself having affected what he is known for, it cannot be part of his legacy.
The placing of the Mannerheim statue in the forest outside Tampere, on the other hand, IS at least in some nominal way a legacy inasmuch as significant numbers of people, especially published scholars, recognize that placement IN THE CONTEXT OF Tampere's political and military history and Mannerheim's involvement there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.114.207.0 ( talk) 17:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Some other red flags: 1. poorly written, in-places-incoherent use of English, indicating probable copy and paste from some other, likely foreign-language source. 2. it takes 4-5 sentences or more to explain what you're even talking about. (If it's something M is known for a sentence or two with a citation to scholarly work is plenty!) 3. Legacy-CANCELLING words in the actual description of the supposed legacy, e.g., "no consensus", "controversial claims", "rumor in Russia", "Mannerheim scholars have only reacted negatively and characterized the claim just a 'Russian fairy tale'."
CONSIDER: A LEGACY is what someone "leaves behind", What s/he is KNOWN FOR; *AND* one of the most basic rules of editing Wikipedia is that all content must be attributed to SCHOLARLY PUBLISHED SOURCES (although in fairness if this rule were enforced, the content of the "project" would shrink drastically; probably about 60-70 percent or more of the entire "encyclopedia" would have to be axed).
PLEASE ASK before placing anything under M's or anyone ELSE's legacy heading: 1. Is there any CONSENSUS among published scholars that the material is what the subject left behind, what s/he is known for? 2. Or if that is too great a burden, too high a standard, a good START would be are there even ONE or TWO published scholars who say this is something s/he is known for?
What it looks like happened here, is some junior high students or Putin trolls or whoever they were wanted to participate by adding something they heard about M that they thought was interesting. Since they couldn't find a proper heading under which the information belonged, and this was the last section written in sentence form, they just stuck it here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.114.207.0 ( talk) 22:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Please see Talk:Mannerheim. Scoo 14:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
The article now states that Mannerheim's height was 194 cm (6'4"). While many sources give this number -- Mannerheim certainly was tall -- I've seen many reliable sources stating his height was 'only' 187 cm (6'2"). - Mikko H. 10:13, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
As a military commander Mannerheim was a mixed success.
Cinik 16:29, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
the edit of 21:09, 10 July 2006 68.166.138.247 claims there is a "new recording" found between Hitler and Mannerheim. Is this really a _new_ recording, or just the old one that mannerheim's adjutants conducted secretly during a train-ride where mannerheim and hitler discussed during Hitler's visit. That tape has been around for quite some time and is said to be pretty much the only tape of hitler speaking in his non-official way (which was quite different from the way he spoke in official speeches etc.), in fact the actor that played Hitler in the movie "der untergang" used that tape for training Hitler's way of speaking in private.
But that would not be a "new" tape as the edit claims. so sources would be great.
Gillis 21:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree it deserves it's own article, but what should we call an article about the recording, it can't really be "secret recording of hitler during his visit to Finland as long named articles probably don't get the attention they deserve. Could it be called "The immola recording" (place) or "The damen recording"(man who made it) or maybe "Hitler's recording in Finland" or? get your suggestions out! Gillis 07:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
I have a problem with this sentence: "After the Russian Revolution of 1917 he successfully led the army of the newly independent Finnish nation through a troubled period between 1918 and 1945." Mannerheim wasn't really a military leader between the wars. See the article itself under heading "Between the wars" and also [1] -- between the wars Mannerheim's interests were mixed, often more charitable than political, and he even worked as a banker. So I feel the above sentence is not accurate and therefore I changed it to "He started his military career in the Imperial Russian army, becoming the leader of Finnish government forces in the civil war of 1918 and during the Second World War." Wempain 20:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Calling Paasikivi a "Russophile" is inaccurate. Paasikivi, who was a member of the Conservative Party, represented what came later to be called "Realpolitik"; his goal was to ensure through a policy of appeasement that Finland retained its independence and as much political free rein as possible. A pragmatic politician if there ever was one, he understood that security could only be guaranteed through friendly relations with the Soviet Union, but this does not render him a "Russophile" - only an astute diplomat.-- Death Bredon 14:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
User:Wempain seems to think he should always be referred to by his full name, Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim. In my experience, he is most commonly known as Carl Gustaf Mannerheim, and Britannica confirms this with the title of their article on him. But I suppose there may be a good argument for moving it still, I don't know. Everyking 18:08, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Carl Gustav Mannerheim ( 1797– 1854), grandfather of the marshall, was an entomologist and governor in Viborgs län. The second middle name is relevant a "natural disambiguator". Beside that, I would like to agree with both of you. :-) To refer to Mannerheim with the ugly acronym C. G. E. Mannerheim or the full name is no good usage, but the article is better moved back to the name that's considered his full and correct by (at least) Swedish speakers, which he was himself. -- Johan Magnus 07:35, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
All right, I moved it back to Wempain's title. Everyking 14:44, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
My grandfather received a commendation from Mannerheim for his participation in the Civil War (or the War of Independence, as it was called at the time). In the spirit of the times, the document is signed (albeit with a stamp) "Kustaa Mannerheim". Kustaa is the Finnish version of the name Gustav/Gustaf and is also used, e.g., of all Swedish kings of that name, including the present one, Kaarle XVI Kustaa (Carl XVI Gustaf). Mannerheim does not appear to have continued this practice very long after 1918. Incidentally, the official candidate of the Finnish royalists for the Finnish throne was not Mannerheim but Prince Friedrich Karl of Hesse, who was actually accepted by parliament and proposed to rule under the name "Väinö I", but this plan fell through when Germany lost WW1. -- Death Bredon 14:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
This article could probably benefit from going into slightly more depth on the relationship between Aksel Airo and the Field Marshal. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 00:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
According to a quite recent study mannerheims family did not come from the netherlands, but from Germany. The finnish wikipedia has already changed this. And it seems someone has tried changing it here but become reverted. The link to the source (in finnish) [2] mtv3 also ran the same new [3]. Could someone find an English source for this? also this of course is just one stdy, but looks like pretty solid evidence though.
Just looks a bit stupid when en.wikipedia says dutch and fi.wikipedia says german.
Gillis 22:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to add some sort of comparison that helps people realise that Mannerheim enjoys a status as a national hero par excellence and father of the nation. Would a comparison with George Washington or Kemal Atatürk be appropriate? These were also war heroes that also skillfully led the difficult birth of a nation and the troubled times that followed and they enjoy a similar "father of the nation" status. -Sensemaker
Shouldn't there be section about movies and shows where he has been character acted by some actor. I'm quite frankly asking this because there is going to be movie of him that will be published around the world. It is called simply Mannerheim. Its just odd that he has been used as character in many movies and in books and there is not a single mention about it. Shouldn't a section about this be added as many other historical people including Hitler has somekind of section dealing with movies, series or books where he has been a character. -- 80.221.239.213 ( talk) 10:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, all. I've looked over this article per the request here. There are still a few issues with the article that I noticed. The main one, which is preventing it from being rated as B-class, is the serious lack of citations throughout the article. There is also the inconsistent style of citations; most of them use the <ref> </ref> format, but there are a few (which I have highlighted in the text with editors' comments) that are parenthetical references. These need to be converted into the former style. Another, more minor issue, is that there is some overlink. General dates shouldn't usually be linked, nor should thinks like car, for instance. I hope these suggestions help the writers of this article improve it, so it can eventually reach FA. Keep up the good work! Parsecboy ( talk) 23:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm no expert on uniforms or anything but the uniform he's wearing in the main photo looks remarkably similar to the German WW2 uniform and he also seems to be wearing German Iron Crosses on his uniform; does anybody know why this is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.242.41 ( talk) 20:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Although surprisingly little is known about his private life, should we include something about present claims suggesting that Mannerheim was a homo-/bisexual? The article mentions his unsuccessful marriage and kind of establishes him as a heterosexual because of that. Apart of the quite recent short film controversial in Finland that portrays him as a homosexual, there is much contemporary debate about his sexuality. Maybe the legacy section should somehow address these claims? With reliable sources of course. JJohannes ( talk) 00:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
From the history I see that there has been some altering back and forth between two versions. The one currently in use is full of derogatory remarks on Hitler without citations. Doesn't correspond to NPOV, and some of it hardly fit into a high class article at all. Instead of just altering it back to the previous smaller version, I prefer to bring it up here. There was a lot of politics about that meeting and Mannerheim was aware of the possible future implications from being to cordial with Hitler, as he was during WWI when Finland approached Germany. Norrefeldt 11:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hitler with Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel (the Chief of the Armed Forces High Command) and the Reich Press Chief Dietrich flew to Finland for meetings with the Finnish president Ryti and Mannerheim in June 1942, see video [4] Notice how Mannerheim greeted Hitler by saluting him several times.
Later Mannerheim paid a visit to Hitler's Headquarters in Germany. There Mannerheim had meeetings with Adolf Hitler, Chief of Staff Halder, Grand Admiral Rader, and Reichsfuhrer-SS Himmler and their staff. Then Mannerheim went to the Headquarters of the Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering, see video [5]
On both videos Mannerheim and his Finnish generals can be seen talking with Hitler and German generals, and also studying military maps together. Discussions were top secret, so a Finnish reporter taped only 20 minutes of conversation, then the taperecorder was stopped by a German security officer. Out of two days and many hours of Hitler - Mannerheim meetings, we have a few minutes of "edited" videos and 20 minutes of "interrupted" radio recording. But there were several more hours of high level discussions, there was much more talking that was not recorded! 130.166.34.165 ( talk) 05:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
What was your point in this post? Everybody knew that they talked about military tactics in both occasions and it seemed that Hitler was the one who talked about it more than Mannerheim. Also of course people talk to eachother it wouldn't be polite not to talk to the guests if they are visiting. Also what is so odd in the saluting that it needs to be mentioned. Of course Mannerheim had to salute Hitler if he made any gesture that could have been considered as greeting as if he would have not saluted it would have been taken as an insult. Mannerheim wasn't stupid as he was quite experienced diplomat. Also Mannerheim has to salute every one of the guest as its the military tradition to greet. Also your film material is only those recorded by Germans there is other films of Hitler's visit in Finland made by YLE (the company that also recorded the secret recording) and are open to anyone to see. So you claiming that there is just few minutes of film is not true. Heres part of a document done of Mannerheim and there you can clearly seperate the German film from the Finnish one as the Finnish one is more clearer than the German one. [6] Also you can see on the Finnish film when the German and Finnish reporters and cameraman move to shoot Mannerheim and Hitler getting in the train and Mannerheim politely letting Hitler go first. Also seen on the German material. Also your information that a German officer stopped the recording is wrong. The man who stopped the recording was the Finnish communication officer when he noticed that the recorder guys were still recording. If a German officer would have noticed that they even recorded that 20 minutes they would have confiscated and destroyed the recording as Hitler didn't want any recording to be in existence where he talked with his normal voice. Also once again the conversation with them was not really any way a secret and every historian of Finnish war history knows that. Even in the document it was stated that Mannerheim and Ryti was expecting Hitler to come with somekind of demands about the war so the negotiations were not really any secret. -- 80.221.235.130 ( talk) 18:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
130.166.34.165 ( talk) 00:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Well... i like this article... but this little thing troubles me, it really is not a big deal but...
"Ironically, Mannerheim never learned to speak Finnish until he was in his fifties."
well, yes it could be seen as ironical to many, but in fact very few of the ruling class spoke finnish as their mother tongue, or even fluently at that time, most spoke swedish(as there is two official languages in finland, and at that time swedish was more common for the ruling class). In fact also russian was more common in mannerheims youth for someone like mannerheim. So in a sence this is really not as ironical/funny as it might be to someone who does not know about that fact. But i can't come up with a smooth way of incorporating that information into it...
any ideas or thoughts?
Gillis 19:11, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Gillis 16:58, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
i removed the picture at the wery top of the page. i do wonder who changed the older picture to that horrific new one.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.210.208 ( talk) 20:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't the legacy section also include a bit more info on Mannerheim League for Child Wellfare? -- TheHande ( talk) 14:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Arguably Mannerheim is chiefly known as a distinguished commander with a military career spanning four decades and five wars
Yet the article says very little about his military exploits and achievements during these wars. It is truely remarkable that the article fails to mention even the Mannerheim Line! In the first two wars, Mannerheim was a minor commander, and thus this article is the main place where his achievements (which elevated him to the status of Finland's most senior military figure and laid the foundation for his future leadership roles) can be summarised, if only briefly. In the last three wars, Mannerheim was the leading figure, and, naturally, the details of the operations under his command are discussed in the respective artciles about these wars. But a summary in the Mannerheim article is in order, like it is done in the Russian language article. BorisG ( talk) 17:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Considering Finland's 20th Century history (e.g., civil war in 1917-1918, the Terijoki gov't in this time period) and the presumptive unfamiliarity of many readers of this article with the history, the way it was expressed prior to the change by the user identified by only his/her IP address appears preferable. If the esteemed contributor feels strongly about the change, when changing it back to "Finnish Defense Forces," would you please put the definite article in front of FDF so it's clear there weren't other FD forces. Thanks. (The definite article in front would be standard English usage, and might accomplish the same thing as the way it was done before.) Paavo273 ( talk) 16:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Firstly, thanks to anonymous user using IP #95.150.233.48 for the great edits, especially ridding the article of dead Wikilinks. Rel spelling changes I've reverted, I can't find any authority for Britified spelling in this article under Wikipedia:Manual of style#National varieties of English. To my knowledge and IMO, USA had the much stronger connection to the Marshal, just, e.g., sold him some aeroplanes his pilots used w/ great skill, sold him other war materiel, sent some significant if totally inadequate humanitarian aid, etc. Paavo273 ( talk) 01:17, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
1. 'Don't think there's any real disagreement here about what happened. It's just a logical contradiction that you can fight and demobilize at the same time.
2. If the way I've fixed it now is not satisfactory to you, then I ask as per WP:Verifiability#Citing non-English sources, that you or s.o. quote from the original apparently Finnish source what it actually says, and I will add a tag to that effect.
3. That source citation is also defective (as used for the first time earlier under the Brief Presidency heading), lacks page number and also lacks sufficient publication info to be able to find it. Of course, even an incomplete source is better than no source, which this article suffers from. (Recently read an interesting biography of M and hope to add cites from it to support a lot of the uncited info in the article.)
4. Rel pronouns vs. antecedents, it's standard procedure to rename the antecedent, in this case the subject of the article, at the beginning of a new paragraph. This is not a controversial convention, and is done widely including in this article. As it is, this paragraph barely mentions M as it is. Paavo273 ( talk) 17:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
2. It is not accurate currently(so it is not acceptable) as the units deployed against the Germans were not exempted from it. Also, your own 'corrections' lacked citations just as well - use of 'logic' like you did in such a case is actually violation of WP:NOR clause if you do not have sources to support your edit(s). Here is one source which supports what i stated (Google books link) which makes it abundantly clear that Finnish demobilization was concluded prior to the termination of hostilities.
- Wanderer602 ( talk) 22:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi all. I'm proposing to delete the following statement:
"It has been suggested that one reason why the Soviet offensive in Karelian Isthmus in June 1944 took the Finns by surprise was that Mannerheim was unable to see the forest for the trees. There was no other authority save Mannerheim to collect the intelligence and turn it into operational orders.[citation needed]"
This would be extremely weaselly even were it sourced (e.g., "It has been suggested..."), and nobody has bothered to add a citation to it since it was tagged in August 2009. Now is the time to place the cite or argue for further keeping. Absent a proper cite or persuasive argument to keep, I will plan to delete it soon. Paavo273 ( talk) 19:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
User:Ttalho added the following, which I removed:
As the head of the White ( right-wing) troops, Mannerheim was highly distrusted among the Reds ( left-wing supporters) during the war and after it. He earned himself the nickname "Lahtari" ("The Executioner"), a reference to the mass executions of Reds committed by the White troops at the end of the civil war.
I think this is both an inappropriate political interpretation as well as technically incorrect. "Lahtari" was a derogatory term used by the Reds (communists) of all Whites (non-communists), not just General Mannerheim. The term was used during the war as well, so its roots were not in the post-war executions. Also, it's natural for a party in a civil war to distrust the leader of the other party. This distrust of the Reds didn't disappear with the end of the brief civil war, but remarkably at the time of the Russian aggression of 1939 (The Winter War) the former Reds joined the Whites to fight the invaders, all under the command of General Mannerheim.
For more information about the distrust between the former Reds and Whites, see Civil War in Finland#Outcome and Lapua Movement. I think the political atmosphere in Finland in the 1920s and 1930s is an interesting subject and the label "lahtari" has to do with this topic, but this discussion shouldn't be in this biographical article.
- Wempain 01:28, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim was born on 4-th of june but in Europe it was 16-th of june because in Russian Empire (Finland was its part at that moment) it was Julian calendar used up to year 1918. So his date of deth in this artcle is given in Gregorian calendar, but his date of birth is given in Julian calendar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Шивва Рудра ( talk • contribs) 12:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
The first name which was used by Mannerheim was Gustaf, as can be seen at the homepage of the Mannerheim Museum [9] and at Kansallisbiografia page with biographies over famous Finns [10]. I don't think any of his friends said "Carl Gustaf Emil" to him. As long as all the names are not needed for disambiguation purposes, they are not needed in the article heading. See the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Proper names#Personal names: "However, if the person is conventionally known by only their first and last names and disambiguation is not required, any middle names should be omitted from the article title." Snowsuit Wearer ( talk| contribs) 21:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus, leaning not moved. No consensus that the proposed title is the common name. Jenks24 ( talk) 08:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim →
Gustaf Mannerheim – Having the full name (with all his three first names) in the article heading goes against the Manual of Style. Mannerheim's most used first name was only Gustaf. Also see discussion above.
Snowsuit Wearer (
talk|
contribs) 09:37, 24 October 2015 (UTC) --Relisted.
Georgie says "Happy Halloween!" (
BOO!)
05:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
I was going to add "Overly detailed" tag to the article, due to the amount on the intricate detail, but thought I'd post here first. Any feedback? K.e.coffman ( talk) 18:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
First it ought to be noted that Finland was nothing but an integral part of Sweden until 1809.
Second, i removed a section and a source claimed that CGE Mannerheim would have "became a strong proponent for the adoption of Finnish as a national language, to the dismay of the minority Finn-Swedes who wanted only Swedish as a single official language". The used source doesn't (i) handle the person being discussed in this wikipage, but instead a member of that family in 1840s, (ii) nor does it actually say what the editor claimed it would have. There is not a single word that would indicate that there would have been 'dismay' of any sorts or even to the issue of Finn-Swedes. - Wanderer602 ( talk) 18:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ra.yle.fi/ramgen/radioarkisto/poliitikot/c_g_e_mannerheim.rmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:54, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The article states that Mannerheim was given the rank of field marshal which it describes as honorary. That is incorrect, while the rank understandably carries prestige with it, it is a real rank commensurate with the larger forces commanded than those typically assigned to a full general. In American parlance, the 5 Star "general of the armies" is our equivalent of a field marshal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.182.83.219 ( talk) 02:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
This may seem silly, but I'd prefer a picture of Mannerheim's equestrian statue where he doesn't have a seagull on his head.
The pronunciation "kɑːɭ ²ɡɵstav ˈeːmɪl ²manːɛrˌheɪm" is outlandish, extremely bizarre, something you never hear in Finland, with the grave accents and the "ɭ" and some vowel qualities. It is based on the phonology of the Swedish language in Sweden. Could someone please provide a reliable IPA pronunciation for the name in Finland Swedish. The same pronunciation is used, with very slight modifications, in Finnish, too. -- Surfo ( talk) 08:50, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Could someone enlighten me on as to when did he get that baron's title? Marshal, sure, we Finns tend to use this title when referring to him but baron? To my understanding this might be a simple mistake as I sincerely don't remember coming across a reference to him being a baron during my 19 years of life, even when when my country has been talked about in history classes. No joke, I really don't remember him being given that title. Iikka Backman ( talk) 11:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Iikka Backman
His daughter Sophie Mannerheim Jr. (1895–1963) is listed with a hyperlink, which just clicks back to this article. Valetude ( talk) 22:48, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Someone please check out the photo of Hitler and Mannerheim, it has been crudely photoshopped with Trump's face over Hitler's, as can easily be seen when checking out the history of that file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.55.140.150 ( talk) 10:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
In the intro: "Twenty years later, when Finland was twice at war with the Soviet Union from November 1939 until September 1944, Mannerheim successfully led the defence of Finland as commander-in-chief of the country's armed forces."
While Finland definitely performed well above its weight class and Mannerheim deserves significant credit for that, I feel the word "successfully" is incorrect due to the fact that Finland technically lost both wars and ceded territory each time. Admitted counter argument: Helsinki never fell and Finland was spared the embarrassments felt by most other nations who lost to the Soviets -- 52.60.131.138 ( talk) 17:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Reluctant to edit this myself because I'm not familiar enough with Mannerheim but the English throughout this entire article is pretty poor. The Childhood and Education sections particularly read as if they have been put through Google translate. Is anyone able to do anything about this? Again don't want to do it myself because I'm no expert on him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francis vb ( talk • contribs) 14:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
User:Francis vb commented above about "bad English" without specifics. Here are two details needing fixes:
And the abbreviation "Meri (1990)" is repeatedly given in notes, but no expanded reference is available in the bibliography. Does anyone have that source? Maybe it was included in early version of this article, which appears to be translated from Finnish or some other language, or in the Finnish wikipedia version of it. -- Doncram ( talk) 19:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
P.S. The "lovable love of hearts" and more which does not make sense apparently was copied verbatim from the Google translated-to-English version of Finnish language source here. Need a Finnish native speaker to reconsider that source. -- Doncram ( talk) 19:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
He was not 6'4". His actual height was around 6'2". ( Westerhaley ( talk) 16:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC))
The article says:
As far I understand, "Dalai Lama" is a title, not a name. Shouldn't that be "who had met with the Dalai Lama"? JIP | Talk 20:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
"Twenty years later, when Finland was twice at war with the Soviet Union in the period from November 1939 until September 1944, Mannerheim led the defence of Finland as commander-in-chief of the country's armed forces." Unlike in the Winter War, the Soviets are not the aggressors of the Continuation War so he was not leading the "defence of Finland". Mannerheim and the Finnish army planned joint operations with their Nazi counterparts as part of Operation Barbarossa. According to the German military attache to Finland in WW2, Mannerheim had personally ordered preperations for a joint attack with Germany as early in September 1940. Regardless of whether or not you think about Mannerheim or Finland's role in WW2, it is clear that this should be changed. 23:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Originalcola ( talk • contribs)
The reasons for the Continuation War are manyfold and the question of "agressorship" is not straightforward. The Soviets shot down a Finnish civilian passenger aircraft (the Ju 82 "Kaleva") over the Gulf of Finland with nine persons on board on June 14th, 1940 during the "interim peace" between the Winter War and the Continuation War in an apparent attempt to acquire French and American diplomatic mail being carried by couriers. Foreign minister Vyatcheslav Molotov travelled to Berlin in November 1940 to ask Hitler to allow the Soviet Union to occupy Finland but received a negative answer. Finnish military personnel were acquainted with "Operation Barbarossa" on a visit to Berlin in late May 1941 but did not commit to taking part (as per their orders from the government). There is no evidence that Mannerheim would have "personally ordered preparations for a joint attack with Germany in September 1940"; this would have made no sense since Germany and the USSR were allies at that point, as stipulated by the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939. In discussions with the Germans in early June 1941, the Finns made it clear that they would only join in a German attack if they were attacked first by the Soviets. The actual military conflict began with the Soviet artillery and Air Force bombarding several military and non-military targets in Finland beginning June 22nd. Finland did not retaliate at first and tried to convince the Soviets of their neutrality. After the Soviet Air Force bombed Helsinki and several other cities (i.e., civilian targets) on June 25th, the Finnish government was forced to admit that it was at war and military operations commenced the next day. Whether the fact that the Finnish troops were able to advance quickly, take back the areas that had been ceded to the USSR after the Winter War and continue further into Eastern Karelia makes Finland the "agressor" is debatable -- one could compare the situation to the 6-day war of 1967 when Israel made a pre-emptive strike when it was fully expecting to be attacked itself -- but according to Marshal Mannerheim's answer to Churchill, the main reason for the advance further than the old border was to shorten the front line and secure a buffer against the Soviet counter attack that was sure to come. Mannerheim's motive was thus the defence of Finland from a renewed Russian attack, which all signs before the Continuation War suggested was being prepared; he just got there "firstest with the mostest men" as a Confederate general is supposed to have said.-- Jarmo K. ( talk) 16:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
can you all please stop editing out any mention of controversy? wikipedia isn't supposed to be a great man memorial but actually offer accurate information on people and that would include the many controversies.
Mx-Spoon (
talk)
01:30, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. to the title proposed, but there may be support for alternatives in a future RM.( closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 15:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim → Gustaf Mannerheim – as per Wikipedia:Article titles#Common names his name should just be Gustaf Mannerheim, not have all of his three given names. He is also called just Gustaf Mannerheim at Wikipedia of his home language, Swedish. 95.199.4.149 ( talk) 22:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
1. Firstly, 'fixed some imprecise language.
2. Secondly, LEGACY means what was left behind by someone, in the context used here close in meaning to the person's REPUTATION, what s/he is KNOWN FOR. Obscure content that no published Mannerheim scholar says M is known for, does NOT belong under legacy. If someone wants to create a heading in this article called "Blog of Random Gossip, Obscure Media Projects Including Those that Never Got Made, and Rumors about His Love Life" then the stuff I deleted might have a home.
Sadly, RANDOM GOSSIP is what much of Wikipedia has become.
It doesn't serve this article and especially not its LEGACY section, e.g., to talk about (A) a movie that never was made, (B) a plaque in a foreign, hostile country that was REMOVED, or (C) unsubstantiated rumours about Mannerheim's flings with women, with boys, or whomever or whatever, or about which or what gender(s) he preferred sexually. ESPECIALLY if no published Mannerheim scholars agree that this is what he is known for. Absent the REMOVAL or NON-HAPPENING itself having affected what he is known for, it cannot be part of his legacy.
The placing of the Mannerheim statue in the forest outside Tampere, on the other hand, IS at least in some nominal way a legacy inasmuch as significant numbers of people, especially published scholars, recognize that placement IN THE CONTEXT OF Tampere's political and military history and Mannerheim's involvement there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.114.207.0 ( talk) 17:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Some other red flags: 1. poorly written, in-places-incoherent use of English, indicating probable copy and paste from some other, likely foreign-language source. 2. it takes 4-5 sentences or more to explain what you're even talking about. (If it's something M is known for a sentence or two with a citation to scholarly work is plenty!) 3. Legacy-CANCELLING words in the actual description of the supposed legacy, e.g., "no consensus", "controversial claims", "rumor in Russia", "Mannerheim scholars have only reacted negatively and characterized the claim just a 'Russian fairy tale'."
CONSIDER: A LEGACY is what someone "leaves behind", What s/he is KNOWN FOR; *AND* one of the most basic rules of editing Wikipedia is that all content must be attributed to SCHOLARLY PUBLISHED SOURCES (although in fairness if this rule were enforced, the content of the "project" would shrink drastically; probably about 60-70 percent or more of the entire "encyclopedia" would have to be axed).
PLEASE ASK before placing anything under M's or anyone ELSE's legacy heading: 1. Is there any CONSENSUS among published scholars that the material is what the subject left behind, what s/he is known for? 2. Or if that is too great a burden, too high a standard, a good START would be are there even ONE or TWO published scholars who say this is something s/he is known for?
What it looks like happened here, is some junior high students or Putin trolls or whoever they were wanted to participate by adding something they heard about M that they thought was interesting. Since they couldn't find a proper heading under which the information belonged, and this was the last section written in sentence form, they just stuck it here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.114.207.0 ( talk) 22:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)