I'm little confused by "was probably the reason". Was there another more obvious reason for this action?
There is never really any specific reason why one school steals another school's basketball coach, but in this case the most prominent accomplishment is not likely to be challenged. I have slightly modified the text because the text actually points to a pair of victories as the reason.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 19:24, 5 October 2014 (UTC)reply
There is some de-linking that needs to be done: depth chart, head coach, points, rebounds, free throw, steals.
I just checked the duplicate links tool and only one link was redundant. Most of the other links you mentioned are generally suppose to be linked in basketball articles.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 18:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The article that has the information about the team that they played is in the latter link. It has the information about the players and coaches that he played against. It also clarifies the accomplishments of the team that he played against.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 19:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)reply
ref 28–this appears to be blog, judging by the site's banner
Modern standards for
WP:RS allow for blogs from experts on topics of their expertise. The Big Ten Conference is a sufficiently reliable source for the rankings of its own teams, which is a very objective thing, even though the source is the conferences official blog.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 22:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Other references seem reliable and properly formatted.
Tony, I've finished the review. Address the notes above and I'm ready to pass the article. The only concern left was linking the words which I consider part of the everyday vocabulary, but since you're more experienced in writing sport biographies, I'll trust your word.--
Retrohead (
talk) 20:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)reply
I'm little confused by "was probably the reason". Was there another more obvious reason for this action?
There is never really any specific reason why one school steals another school's basketball coach, but in this case the most prominent accomplishment is not likely to be challenged. I have slightly modified the text because the text actually points to a pair of victories as the reason.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 19:24, 5 October 2014 (UTC)reply
There is some de-linking that needs to be done: depth chart, head coach, points, rebounds, free throw, steals.
I just checked the duplicate links tool and only one link was redundant. Most of the other links you mentioned are generally suppose to be linked in basketball articles.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 18:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The article that has the information about the team that they played is in the latter link. It has the information about the players and coaches that he played against. It also clarifies the accomplishments of the team that he played against.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 19:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)reply
ref 28–this appears to be blog, judging by the site's banner
Modern standards for
WP:RS allow for blogs from experts on topics of their expertise. The Big Ten Conference is a sufficiently reliable source for the rankings of its own teams, which is a very objective thing, even though the source is the conferences official blog.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 22:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Other references seem reliable and properly formatted.
Tony, I've finished the review. Address the notes above and I'm ready to pass the article. The only concern left was linking the words which I consider part of the everyday vocabulary, but since you're more experienced in writing sport biographies, I'll trust your word.--
Retrohead (
talk) 20:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)reply