![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Angel.zhu534,
Yolandaye,
Nicholasrbadal.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 18:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Angel.zhu534,
Yolandaye,
Nicholasrbadal.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 18:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Carceral Feminism now directs here, as we should not have parallel articles on the same topic. If there are any significant differences between this version and the present article, they should be merged. --Animalparty! ( talk) 17:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
On which pages of the Krishna de la Cruz article can I find the "third-wave feminism" section? It's entirely sourced to that paper. There's a copy here, but I can't find anything about third-wave feminism. SarahSV (talk) 18:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
It was added on 30 November by Nicholasrbadal. SarahSV (talk) 18:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Given the lack of response, I've removed it. SarahSV (talk) 20:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
This essay seems to be OR and much of it appears to be a WP:SYN violation. Sources are used that do not mention "carceral feminism", a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 2007. The article should begin by explaining the origin of the term and who uses it. Instead it seems to offer the author's personal view of a range of issues, some of them not mentioned by the sources. Does anyone identify as a "carceral feminist"?
It would take weeks of work to sort this out. I'm therefore minded to redirect the page to Feminism, and will do soon unless someone objects and has a better suggestion. SarahSV (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, we seem to have lost the page history, which is now at Carceral feminism (version 3), following this request from MartinPoulter. This is the third time I've seen drafts moved over to pages that already exist (not by Anthony) and the page histories deleted to make way for them, then either not undeleted or undeleted but moved elsewhere. I can't see any reason to do that, and creating a new page in mainspace is best avoided. Can the histories be merged, please? SarahSV (talk) 00:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Anthony, here is the situation. Martin asked you to make a move that was an "uncontroversial technical request". But it was not uncontroversial. In addition, you made several moves that were not needed to achieve what Martin wanted. The result is a split and misleading page history. So I'm asking you to do one of two things:
@ MartinPoulter: "rather than one contributor's say-so"? What happened here is that you (also "one contributor", by the way) asked to have an article's history deleted to replace it with your preferred version. All you have to do now is ask the IP to add his or her text to this article like anyone else. Or you can do it by reverting to that version. If I revert back, citing WP:BRD, then we discuss on talk. That someone wrote a version in draftspace doesn't mean the usual editing process is abandoned. SarahSV (talk) 21:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Martin, I think you haven't understood what happened here. I asked Anthony to merge your version (the draft) into this article's history. Then you could revert to that version if you wanted to. Instead, Anthony has split the histories. Your version is here. Anthony, if that's how you prefer to do it, those other versions should be moved to Talk:Whatever. SarahSV (talk) 22:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Following this RfD, the carceral feminism article is restored, though subject to AfD as normal going forward. All remaining redirects for carceral feminism point here. I believe Carceral Feminism (version 2) could safely be deleted since it has no substantial history, though Carceral feminism (version 2) does. -- BDD ( talk) 19:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Mharmon0718 (
article contribs).
This article (in particular, these sections: the introduction including the definition of carceral feminism; rape; and activist critiques and media discussion) need to have more complete sourcing. A number of sentences make objective claims that are uncited. Hosanna.galea ( talk) 13:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi all. There's a paragraph in the "Activists Critique..." section about Canada that I believe should be deleted as it is irrelevant. It is mainly about forced sterilization of Indigenous women which has nothing to do with prisons at all and the only bit that mentions prisons comments on the over-representation of Indigenous women with no attempt to link this to carceral feminism. If I haven't read a good case for keeping it I'll remove it in a months. Rbngrss 2022 ( talk) 13:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Angel.zhu534,
Yolandaye,
Nicholasrbadal.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 18:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Angel.zhu534,
Yolandaye,
Nicholasrbadal.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 18:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Carceral Feminism now directs here, as we should not have parallel articles on the same topic. If there are any significant differences between this version and the present article, they should be merged. --Animalparty! ( talk) 17:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
On which pages of the Krishna de la Cruz article can I find the "third-wave feminism" section? It's entirely sourced to that paper. There's a copy here, but I can't find anything about third-wave feminism. SarahSV (talk) 18:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
It was added on 30 November by Nicholasrbadal. SarahSV (talk) 18:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Given the lack of response, I've removed it. SarahSV (talk) 20:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
This essay seems to be OR and much of it appears to be a WP:SYN violation. Sources are used that do not mention "carceral feminism", a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 2007. The article should begin by explaining the origin of the term and who uses it. Instead it seems to offer the author's personal view of a range of issues, some of them not mentioned by the sources. Does anyone identify as a "carceral feminist"?
It would take weeks of work to sort this out. I'm therefore minded to redirect the page to Feminism, and will do soon unless someone objects and has a better suggestion. SarahSV (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, we seem to have lost the page history, which is now at Carceral feminism (version 3), following this request from MartinPoulter. This is the third time I've seen drafts moved over to pages that already exist (not by Anthony) and the page histories deleted to make way for them, then either not undeleted or undeleted but moved elsewhere. I can't see any reason to do that, and creating a new page in mainspace is best avoided. Can the histories be merged, please? SarahSV (talk) 00:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Anthony, here is the situation. Martin asked you to make a move that was an "uncontroversial technical request". But it was not uncontroversial. In addition, you made several moves that were not needed to achieve what Martin wanted. The result is a split and misleading page history. So I'm asking you to do one of two things:
@ MartinPoulter: "rather than one contributor's say-so"? What happened here is that you (also "one contributor", by the way) asked to have an article's history deleted to replace it with your preferred version. All you have to do now is ask the IP to add his or her text to this article like anyone else. Or you can do it by reverting to that version. If I revert back, citing WP:BRD, then we discuss on talk. That someone wrote a version in draftspace doesn't mean the usual editing process is abandoned. SarahSV (talk) 21:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Martin, I think you haven't understood what happened here. I asked Anthony to merge your version (the draft) into this article's history. Then you could revert to that version if you wanted to. Instead, Anthony has split the histories. Your version is here. Anthony, if that's how you prefer to do it, those other versions should be moved to Talk:Whatever. SarahSV (talk) 22:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Following this RfD, the carceral feminism article is restored, though subject to AfD as normal going forward. All remaining redirects for carceral feminism point here. I believe Carceral Feminism (version 2) could safely be deleted since it has no substantial history, though Carceral feminism (version 2) does. -- BDD ( talk) 19:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Mharmon0718 (
article contribs).
This article (in particular, these sections: the introduction including the definition of carceral feminism; rape; and activist critiques and media discussion) need to have more complete sourcing. A number of sentences make objective claims that are uncited. Hosanna.galea ( talk) 13:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi all. There's a paragraph in the "Activists Critique..." section about Canada that I believe should be deleted as it is irrelevant. It is mainly about forced sterilization of Indigenous women which has nothing to do with prisons at all and the only bit that mentions prisons comments on the over-representation of Indigenous women with no attempt to link this to carceral feminism. If I haven't read a good case for keeping it I'll remove it in a months. Rbngrss 2022 ( talk) 13:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)