This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To contest this Speedy Deletion, one would simply need to remove the info from Clockwork Angels. Singles are generally not deleted material. Wisdom89 ( T / C) 06:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
The 2 singles I'e listened to are very dissapointing, just doesn't sound like RUSH. And what I had noticed about the article is it lists it as progressive rock. It obviously is not. Not in the lyrics, not in the music, not prog about it. It's simply hard rock, and that's what's dissapointing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.22.231 ( talk) 17:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
P:: Ok Sorry, yeah I guess my whole point was that even though Rush is known for Progressive Rock, these songs shouldn't be listed as it. Which seems unfair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.22.231 ( talk) 20:22, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
I agree, despite the album being labelled as a concept album, it doesn't sound like progressive rock to me (its also disappointing, but this isn't the place to discuss that!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.134.232 ( talk) 18:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I noticed on my CD version of the single, the songs are listed in the correct order, but actually appear in the opposite order with "BU2B" first. I'm wondering first of all if anybody else with a physical CD noticed this, and if so, how it should be dealt with in the tracklisting section of the article? Cheers. Frehley72 ( talk) 18:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To contest this Speedy Deletion, one would simply need to remove the info from Clockwork Angels. Singles are generally not deleted material. Wisdom89 ( T / C) 06:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
The 2 singles I'e listened to are very dissapointing, just doesn't sound like RUSH. And what I had noticed about the article is it lists it as progressive rock. It obviously is not. Not in the lyrics, not in the music, not prog about it. It's simply hard rock, and that's what's dissapointing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.22.231 ( talk) 17:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
P:: Ok Sorry, yeah I guess my whole point was that even though Rush is known for Progressive Rock, these songs shouldn't be listed as it. Which seems unfair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.22.231 ( talk) 20:22, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
I agree, despite the album being labelled as a concept album, it doesn't sound like progressive rock to me (its also disappointing, but this isn't the place to discuss that!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.134.232 ( talk) 18:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
I noticed on my CD version of the single, the songs are listed in the correct order, but actually appear in the opposite order with "BU2B" first. I'm wondering first of all if anybody else with a physical CD noticed this, and if so, how it should be dealt with in the tracklisting section of the article? Cheers. Frehley72 ( talk) 18:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)