GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Gug01 ( talk · contribs) 21:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
This article does not need or have many cleanup banners, such as {{clarifyme}}, {{citation needed}} and {{POW}} tags.
This article does not plagiarise. The images are also properly licensed.
The references are perfect. All paragraphs are properly sourced.
The images are relevant to the topic and they have suitable captions.
This article is well-written. It contains perfect prose. It has a lead section and proper layout. The spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization.
This article contains no original research.
This article is broad in coverage and goes into detail only where necessary.
This article has a neutral point of view.
This article is relatively stable. There has been no edit wars, but there has been quite a few undos in the history of the article due to vandalisms. However, these are not large-scale, so I can summarize that the stability is good enough for this article to be a good article.
This article is ready to be a good article.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Gug01 ( talk · contribs) 21:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
This article does not need or have many cleanup banners, such as {{clarifyme}}, {{citation needed}} and {{POW}} tags.
This article does not plagiarise. The images are also properly licensed.
The references are perfect. All paragraphs are properly sourced.
The images are relevant to the topic and they have suitable captions.
This article is well-written. It contains perfect prose. It has a lead section and proper layout. The spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization.
This article contains no original research.
This article is broad in coverage and goes into detail only where necessary.
This article has a neutral point of view.
This article is relatively stable. There has been no edit wars, but there has been quite a few undos in the history of the article due to vandalisms. However, these are not large-scale, so I can summarize that the stability is good enough for this article to be a good article.
This article is ready to be a good article.