Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gug01 ( talk · contribs) 21:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Immediate problems

Cleanup banners

This article does not need or have many cleanup banners, such as {{clarifyme}}, {{citation needed}} and {{POW}} tags.

Plagiarism

This article does not plagiarise. The images are also properly licensed.

References

The references are perfect. All paragraphs are properly sourced.

Images

The images are relevant to the topic and they have suitable captions.

Well-written?

This article is well-written. It contains perfect prose. It has a lead section and proper layout. The spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization.

Original research

This article contains no original research.

Coverage

This article is broad in coverage and goes into detail only where necessary.

POV

This article has a neutral point of view.

Stability

This article is relatively stable. There has been no edit wars, but there has been quite a few undos in the history of the article due to vandalisms. However, these are not large-scale, so I can summarize that the stability is good enough for this article to be a good article.

Overview

This article is ready to be a good article.