GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Bastian ( talk · contribs) 04:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Please look above for problems listed. I have not gone through the entire article yet, but I will finish reading it later on.
As I said, the prose (spelling, grammar, and punctuation is good for most part), but there is still some room for improvement.
Another problem so far is the citation given in the "Fossil record and other species" section - it says nothing about fossil records or other species. Bastian ( talk) 05:25, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Under the subsection "Diet and predation" there is a contradiction in sources. You list "...four to six plant species making 75% of its diet." and listed this as a source. First, that source cannot be read as the lettering is way too small and so I as a reviewer cannot verify the number 75%. A second source claims "Only seven species represented 60% of the total diet:..." from here.
Another thing in the same section is this: "They will select the leaves of one species and disregard other species surrounding it.[16] Capybaras eat a greater variety of plants during the dry season as there are fewer plants available. While they eat grass during the wet season, they have to switch to reeds during the dry season as they are more abundant.[16]" - since all three sentences come from the same source, I would take out the first citation and just leave the one at the end right after "...more abundant" Bastian ( talk) 18:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Also, remember to always read the GA review list above as I sometimes will leave comments up there, not just here. Bastian ( talk) 19:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Bastian ( talk · contribs) 04:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Please look above for problems listed. I have not gone through the entire article yet, but I will finish reading it later on.
As I said, the prose (spelling, grammar, and punctuation is good for most part), but there is still some room for improvement.
Another problem so far is the citation given in the "Fossil record and other species" section - it says nothing about fossil records or other species. Bastian ( talk) 05:25, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Under the subsection "Diet and predation" there is a contradiction in sources. You list "...four to six plant species making 75% of its diet." and listed this as a source. First, that source cannot be read as the lettering is way too small and so I as a reviewer cannot verify the number 75%. A second source claims "Only seven species represented 60% of the total diet:..." from here.
Another thing in the same section is this: "They will select the leaves of one species and disregard other species surrounding it.[16] Capybaras eat a greater variety of plants during the dry season as there are fewer plants available. While they eat grass during the wet season, they have to switch to reeds during the dry season as they are more abundant.[16]" - since all three sentences come from the same source, I would take out the first citation and just leave the one at the end right after "...more abundant" Bastian ( talk) 18:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Also, remember to always read the GA review list above as I sometimes will leave comments up there, not just here. Bastian ( talk) 19:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)