![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the proposal was moved to Capture of East India Company ship Nautilus. Unless the ship were captured another time, including the Peacock in the title seems superfluous, though there's no prejudice against a new request to mention it. -- BDD ( talk) 18:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Capture of HMS Nautilus → Capture of East India Company ship ''Nautilus'' – Nautilus was an East India Company vessel, not a ship of the Royal Navy. EIC vessels were quasi-military, as they occasionally had to deal with pirates or privateers, but not warships. The present title of the article is incorrect, verging on POV. --Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 14:00, 21 April 2014 (UTC) -- HLGallon ( talk) 12:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, some useful suggestions, but as nobody is questioning the basic premise for the move, I will proceed with it. HLGallon ( talk) 20:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the proposal was moved to Capture of East India Company ship Nautilus. Unless the ship were captured another time, including the Peacock in the title seems superfluous, though there's no prejudice against a new request to mention it. -- BDD ( talk) 18:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Capture of HMS Nautilus → Capture of East India Company ship ''Nautilus'' – Nautilus was an East India Company vessel, not a ship of the Royal Navy. EIC vessels were quasi-military, as they occasionally had to deal with pirates or privateers, but not warships. The present title of the article is incorrect, verging on POV. --Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 14:00, 21 April 2014 (UTC) -- HLGallon ( talk) 12:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, some useful suggestions, but as nobody is questioning the basic premise for the move, I will proceed with it. HLGallon ( talk) 20:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)