![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 October 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Please discuss the dispute here on talk. Try to reach an agreement. Durova Charge! 21:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Re: consolodation of the two links into one; I realise that the two links direct to two different pages on the site, but I am concerned that linking to two pages on a small, private site has the appearance of being self-promoting, and is really unnecessary. It wouldn't be untoward to link to different parts of the same site in references, but there is really no need to do so in the external links. It will actually add legitimacy to the article and the variant; in my experience, it is always spammy links like to porn sites that try to place themselves in the same external links section multiple times. Anchoress 21:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
I think you've misunderstood my concern; having several links to the same site diminishes the credibility of both the site and the article because it gives the appearance of self-promotion. I'm not suggesting that anyone's making money off it, nor am I suggesting that there's any porn on the site. Do you get my meaning? Many WP readers, when they see that the same link shows up several times in ELs, immediately assume it's some form of spammy self-promotion. And as for combining, what's wrong with linking to the main chess section on that site and allowing readers to explore it themselves? That's what I did originally, in my reverted edit. Or better yet, let's expand and improve the prose so that the ELs can be used as references; it is perfectly usual to include several separate links to different sections of one site in separate references. Anchoress 23:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Either the article should be at "Capablanca Random Chess" or the article should read "Capablanca random chess". Hyacinth ( talk) 11:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
In starting positions were the chancellor is in the corner. Shouldn't it be technically possible to castle with the chancellor?
Is this even possible in Capablanca 960.
Sunny3113 (
talk)
20:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Three-Man Chess which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 05:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 October 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Please discuss the dispute here on talk. Try to reach an agreement. Durova Charge! 21:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Re: consolodation of the two links into one; I realise that the two links direct to two different pages on the site, but I am concerned that linking to two pages on a small, private site has the appearance of being self-promoting, and is really unnecessary. It wouldn't be untoward to link to different parts of the same site in references, but there is really no need to do so in the external links. It will actually add legitimacy to the article and the variant; in my experience, it is always spammy links like to porn sites that try to place themselves in the same external links section multiple times. Anchoress 21:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
I think you've misunderstood my concern; having several links to the same site diminishes the credibility of both the site and the article because it gives the appearance of self-promotion. I'm not suggesting that anyone's making money off it, nor am I suggesting that there's any porn on the site. Do you get my meaning? Many WP readers, when they see that the same link shows up several times in ELs, immediately assume it's some form of spammy self-promotion. And as for combining, what's wrong with linking to the main chess section on that site and allowing readers to explore it themselves? That's what I did originally, in my reverted edit. Or better yet, let's expand and improve the prose so that the ELs can be used as references; it is perfectly usual to include several separate links to different sections of one site in separate references. Anchoress 23:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Either the article should be at "Capablanca Random Chess" or the article should read "Capablanca random chess". Hyacinth ( talk) 11:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
In starting positions were the chancellor is in the corner. Shouldn't it be technically possible to castle with the chancellor?
Is this even possible in Capablanca 960.
Sunny3113 (
talk)
20:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Three-Man Chess which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 05:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)