This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cannabinoid receptor antagonist article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Cannabinoid receptor antagonist appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 November 2008 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This page is very, very impressive, and seems to have just popped up out of nowhere..which makes me think this is copypasta. Can't confirm, but if not, very very well done! Miserlou ( talk) 05:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the complement guys! I can assure you that this is not a copypaste, we are four pharmacy students who have worked really hard to create this page. But exactly, you can see the history on our userpage. We decided to build up our page there, and then create this page with the correct title. bida ( talk) 10:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was 'support for move.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 04:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Almost everything there is to know about this class of drugs can be found in this article. Why not move this article to " Cannabinoid receptor 1 antagonist"? -- PFHLai ( talk) 15:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment: on Wikipedia:Requested moves the request is to move to Cannabinoid receptor antagonists (plural); I prefer Cannabinoid receptor antagonist (singular). Although the article at present does not discuss CB2 antagonists at any length, such discussion would fit within the article, or in one of a set of articles for which Cannabinoid receptor antagonist would then provide an overview. -- Una Smith ( talk) 20:34, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Support. Cannabinoid receptor antagonist can be used in text as is; the current title more often than not would have to be piped. -- Una Smith ( talk) 22:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cannabinoid receptor antagonist article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Cannabinoid receptor antagonist appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 November 2008 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This page is very, very impressive, and seems to have just popped up out of nowhere..which makes me think this is copypasta. Can't confirm, but if not, very very well done! Miserlou ( talk) 05:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the complement guys! I can assure you that this is not a copypaste, we are four pharmacy students who have worked really hard to create this page. But exactly, you can see the history on our userpage. We decided to build up our page there, and then create this page with the correct title. bida ( talk) 10:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was 'support for move.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 04:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Almost everything there is to know about this class of drugs can be found in this article. Why not move this article to " Cannabinoid receptor 1 antagonist"? -- PFHLai ( talk) 15:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment: on Wikipedia:Requested moves the request is to move to Cannabinoid receptor antagonists (plural); I prefer Cannabinoid receptor antagonist (singular). Although the article at present does not discuss CB2 antagonists at any length, such discussion would fit within the article, or in one of a set of articles for which Cannabinoid receptor antagonist would then provide an overview. -- Una Smith ( talk) 20:34, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Support. Cannabinoid receptor antagonist can be used in text as is; the current title more often than not would have to be piped. -- Una Smith ( talk) 22:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)