This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Politics Low‑importance Candidates of the 1910 Australian federal election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Candidate for Oxley. I'm not sure how best to describe him. Currently he's listed as Ind Lab, but that's not right -- the Brisbane Courier reported him as Labour and corrected it the next day. In that linked article he's instead described as "standing in the democratic interest". I don't know if that's an actual party I haven't heard of or if it's meant in the sense of making a democratic contest instead of allowing Edwards a walkover. My best guess is to just call him an independent, but I'm finding myself quite unconfident with party affiliations in the early 20th century. Pappubahry ( talk) 12:01, 3 March 2015 (UTC) reply

I suspect it's more a case of a descriptor - we might call him an Independent Democrat, I guess, but that would be pushing it. It's a bit like how people ran as "Independent Liberals" when there was no actual "Liberal Party". I think Independent is fine. (The Ind Lab is probably because there was no Labour candidate in Oxley for some reason.) Frickeg ( talk) 12:43, 3 March 2015 (UTC) reply