This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Hematology-oncology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force. Evolutionary biology Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hey James! I really liked your article. I would recommend reorganizing it into neat categories, as I’m sure you saw some other students doing as you completed your peer reviews. I also didn’t have mine split up into anything other than paragraphs and I think it will improve the readability of both of our articles a lot. There were some areas throughout the article that could be phrased better and I flagged a few as examples. I think polishing those edges will really improve it as a whole. The information is good, it just needs further revisions. One thing I may recommend adding is examples. A few practical studies that have looked at cancer evolution may be worth adding. I appreciate the opportunity to evaluate your article. Christie ChristieBirdsong ( talk) 09:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC) reply